Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

slowplay 05-12-2013 09:09 AM


Originally Posted by Lifeisgood (Post 1408000)
All US carriers.. except a few right? :)
UPS for example pays $149/hour the second year FO's.
And per diem to Asia is at 3.60.

As usual, there will be 20 ALPA addicts who would tell me to go there. Thanks for the consideration, gents, I'd prefer to fight a fight and make Delta a better place.

Don't think going to UPS will work out for you - from APC:

UPS

Not hiring. 44 pilots on furlough.

UPS has hired pilots into UPS's non-union management pilot workforce with IPA pilots on furlough. Not currently hiring management pilots

Rogue24 05-12-2013 09:46 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1407823)
First of all, it was 62% - not 68%. 62% did NOT say it was good enough. 62% voted YES...big difference. DALPA completely mismanaged our negotiations, there can be little doubt of that left. The proof of that is most of the really bad actors in that drama are gone now.

Signing off on a deal without consulting the MEC, then handing it to the MEC for a vote as an already done deal needing a rubber stamp was a disaster. Many of the pilots who voted YES did so becasue they realized how completely outclassed our MEC leadership was, and it would be that same outclassed leadership that went back into the real Section 6 negotiations.

Carl

BS. Most voted yes, because though it was not the deal they wanted, it was cash in their pocket.

FWIW, I voted No. Wasn't good enough, but 62% did, and its your Contract.


I know you hopping mad at DALPA. Good, talk to your Rep in DTW. He probably agrees with you. There are probably plenty that agree with you around the system.

You think talking to your Reps is a waste of time? Well e-mail em, have everyone email em. Give them hard evidence that the silent and no so silent majority want a better deal the next time one comes around. Change their philosophy, I try to every chance I get. Why? Because if they hear from many of us on many of the issues, they are going to see another side of it. If they get nothing, they assume that everything is A OK.

Tilting at windmills on here feels good, but the Reps probably do not spend a ton of time reading this. On top of that, its 40 of the same posters. To make a real change in the way business is done, you need to be active and present. Stating they will not listen to you and its not worth your time is a cop out. You and others preach that DALPA and ALPA need to put effort in. Well, given the fact that may of the donut crowd do not contribute or provide feedback anymore, there is no counter balance to things. For there to be the change you desire, it can not be one or two pilots running and in most cases losing every year. This malcontent quadrant of the DAL pilots need to reengage and force the issues in each and every election, and on each and every issue. Until that happens, the mountain is not going to move too far.

Rogue24 05-12-2013 09:47 AM


Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL (Post 1407993)
I think you nailed it on the why of the yes vote and the where the process was deliberately gerrymandered.

Also they did not get rid of all the bad actors - they got rid of the good ones in the negotiating team and reelected the weak Moak protege for Chairman as part of their planned resurgence after the defeat of Chairman O'Malley. The election of one of the New York reps with no prior negotiating experience, who announced only a few days before the negotiating committee election, as a replacement for a highly experienced effective negotiator, together with that reps timing of his resignation to allow an LEC meeting election vs. full ballot election was a Faustian bargain made by those ousted plotting the re-emergence of the Moak/O'Malley hegemony. The manifest self interest of the that election speaks volumes.

Apparently the MEC Secretary and MEC Treasurer, both unabashed supporters of the previous regime who owe their lucrative positions to patronage are actively canvassing and engaging newly elected reps to try and get support for the recall of the newly elected MEC Chairman and resurrect their regime.

You are correct about it has absolutely nothing to do with what the line pilots want. Despite all of the dysfunction and lack of representing the will of the pilots within DALPA, the alternative of the DPA is still far, far worse although I hope they get their election so they can get their butts handed to them and then hopefully decide to refocus on legitimate and effective democratic reforms for a "Glasnost" within ALPA.


Is the bolded opinion or fact?

TANSTAAFL 05-12-2013 10:06 AM


Originally Posted by Rogue24 (Post 1408019)
Is the bolded opinion or fact?

I can't say it is fact as a certainty because I'm not on the MEC and my reps as firm supporters of electing Captain Roberts have not been approached, but I consider it more than opinion from a fairly reliable source. Given the history of the players and the political division present over the ousting of O'Malley it's entirely plausible.

zoomiezombie 05-12-2013 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL (Post 1407993)
Despite all of the dysfunction and lack of representing the will of the pilots within DALPA, the alternative of the DPA is still far, far worse although I hope they get their election so they can get their butts handed to them and then hopefully decide to refocus on legitimate and effective democratic reforms for a "Glasnost" within ALPA.

I want Caplinger to hold fast to the promise to give it 2 years. An election is going to end up costing millions of dollars of dues money. We've been told by DALPA to expect dues refunds going forward and I don't want to fund a war fighting a lost "one child policy" cause. I want that dues money back in my pocket.

TANSTAAFL 05-12-2013 10:14 AM


Originally Posted by zoomiezombie (Post 1408028)
I want Caplinger to hold fast to the promise to give it 2 years. An election is going to end up costing millions of dollars of dues money. We've been told by DALPA to expect dues refunds going forward and I don't want to fund a war fighting a lost "one child policy" cause. I want that dues money back in my pocket.

Isn't TC already a year past that promise?

finis72 05-12-2013 10:16 AM


Originally Posted by Lifeisgood (Post 1408000)
All US carriers.. except a few right? :)
UPS for example pays $149/hour the second year FO's.
And per diem to Asia is at 3.60.

As usual, there will be 20 ALPA addicts who would tell me to go there. Thanks for the consideration, gents, I'd prefer to fight a fight and make Delta a better place.

First off i would never say go to another place, secondly DALPA needs to hear and listen to all sides so make sure you stay engaged and let them know how you feel. If the TA had been turned down I would have supported the majority in trying to get a better contract. I have issues with saying Cargo carriers are in our industry ( i understand both sides) but you did conveniently pick one of the two highest paid. DL would be 3 out of 21 on the cargo side so there is room for improvement.

bigbusdriver 05-12-2013 10:18 AM


Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL (Post 1408027)
I can't say it is fact as a certainty because I'm not on the MEC and my reps as firm supporters of electing Captain Roberts have not been approached, but I consider it more than opinion from a fairly reliable source. Given the history of the players and the political division present over the ousting of O'Malley it's entirely plausible.

You don't know because you say aren't involved in the MEC and your reps don't know but you decided that it's plausible to put it out that you think there's a recall effort under way W.T.F?

Flamer 05-12-2013 10:20 AM


Originally Posted by zoomiezombie (Post 1408028)
I want Caplinger to hold fast to the promise to give it 2 years. An election is going to end up costing millions of dollars of dues money. We've been told by DALPA to expect dues refunds going forward and I don't want to fund a war fighting a lost "one child policy" cause. I want that dues money back in my pocket.

That dues refund is less than pennies on the dollar compared to continuing on the negotiating path we are on now. Keep the change please.

TANSTAAFL 05-12-2013 10:33 AM


Originally Posted by bigbusdriver (Post 1408031)
You don't know because you say aren't involved in the MEC and your reps don't know but you decided that it's plausible to put it out that you think there's a recall effort under way W.T.F?

I didn't say my reps don't know I said they weren't approached. I heard the ousted regime was muttering recall before Roberts even took office. Are you really surprised? I guess we'll find out if they are or they aren't - one of those self critiquing, self validating rumors.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands