Details on Delta TA
06-25-2015 | 09:10 AM
#9971
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Well something Atlanta 777 drivers should of been concerned about in this TA . If they would of banded the A330 to 777/747 like other airlines I would of headed there when cuts come to the whale, but in this TA IM NOW HEADED TO ATL 777. Sorry bottom 777 dwellers. Vote NO!
06-25-2015 | 09:13 AM
#9972
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
I totally get the $$ decision. I just didnt know the 330 banded with 744/777 was even up for discussion. I thought we were all against pay banding.
Would you still be for it if the co agreed to band them, but insisted on a prorate average of the rates? Like we have 50 330s and 34 777/744, so 50x330 rate + 34x 777/744 rate divided by 84? (Fleet numbers are for example only btw.). Or just a plain average of 777 and 330 pay so that 330 pays more but 777 pays less? In either case (including the current TA) the 330 at DAL pays more than the 330 at AA.
Would you still be for it if the co agreed to band them, but insisted on a prorate average of the rates? Like we have 50 330s and 34 777/744, so 50x330 rate + 34x 777/744 rate divided by 84? (Fleet numbers are for example only btw.). Or just a plain average of 777 and 330 pay so that 330 pays more but 777 pays less? In either case (including the current TA) the 330 at DAL pays more than the 330 at AA.
06-25-2015 | 09:39 AM
#9973
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 3
From: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Did anyone else notice that every endorsement from the heads of other pilot groups (SWA, FedEx, AA) in the latest email from the MEC fails to acknowledge any of the actual details in the TA? Every single person gives praise to our MEC based solely on positive "rumors" they've heard about the TA. So they are blindly endorsing a new contract without knowing any of the details or concessions? What blatant abuse by our MEC with a bunch of inaccurate propaganda...
06-25-2015 | 09:53 AM
#9974
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
06-25-2015 | 10:44 AM
#9975
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 637
Likes: 15
From: Stretch DC-9 Gear Slinger
Did anyone else notice that every endorsement from the heads of other pilot groups (SWA, FedEx, AA) in the latest email from the MEC fails to acknowledge any of the actual details in the TA? Every single person gives praise to our MEC based solely on positive "rumors" they've heard about the TA. So they are blindly endorsing a new contract without knowing any of the details or concessions? What blatant abuse by our MEC with a bunch of inaccurate propaganda...
Sell this TA at all cost!
06-25-2015 | 11:25 AM
#9976
Mother’s finest
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 311
Likes: 8
From: 220A
Thx for the correction SF. Apologies, not trying to mislead on that front.
06-25-2015 | 11:58 AM
#9977
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,613
Likes: 627
Did anyone else notice that every endorsement from the heads of other pilot groups (SWA, FedEx, AA) in the latest email from the MEC fails to acknowledge any of the actual details in the TA? Every single person gives praise to our MEC based solely on positive "rumors" they've heard about the TA. So they are blindly endorsing a new contract without knowing any of the details or concessions? What blatant abuse by our MEC with a bunch of inaccurate propaganda...
Jet Blue's response starts with "Thank You for the highlights". I'm sure MD left out some of the finer details like caving on scope, sick leave and OE pulls in his "highlights"
FedEx had "heard rumors of the details of the TA" prior to writing the congratulatory letter.
Not one of these supposed congratulatory letters is based on review or understanding of the TA. The only letter with any substance is the response from UAL. Why was that one missing?
These letters of support are nothing more that the obligatory "cute baby" comment no matter how ugly the kiddo really is.
06-25-2015 | 12:06 PM
#9978
Da Hudge
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
The letter from the SWAPA President specifically states "I have not seen the complete details of the deal"
Jet Blue's response starts with "Thank You for the highlights". I'm sure MD left out some of the finer details like caving on scope, sick leave and OE pulls in his "highlights"
FedEx had "heard rumors of the details of the TA" prior to writing the congratulatory letter.
Not one of these supposed congratulatory letters is based on review or understanding of the TA. The only letter with any substance is the response from UAL. Why was that one missing?
These letters of support are nothing more that the obligatory "cute baby" comment no matter how ugly the kiddo really is.
Jet Blue's response starts with "Thank You for the highlights". I'm sure MD left out some of the finer details like caving on scope, sick leave and OE pulls in his "highlights"
FedEx had "heard rumors of the details of the TA" prior to writing the congratulatory letter.
Not one of these supposed congratulatory letters is based on review or understanding of the TA. The only letter with any substance is the response from UAL. Why was that one missing?
These letters of support are nothing more that the obligatory "cute baby" comment no matter how ugly the kiddo really is.
06-25-2015 | 01:00 PM
#9979
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
