Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
04-20-2018 | 07:12 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
It’s actually more like a 100 hour difference on 1000 hours, if average of 12 mins out of an average 2 hour flight are at the gate / pushback / disconnect.
04-20-2018 | 07:20 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
04-20-2018 | 07:42 AM
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 107
Union and company.... When they both agree it must be right...
Q: What times should the pilots use for their logbooks?
A: The pilots should use the ACARS (OUT-IN) times for logbook times (as they do today). If that is not available, the logbook time can be referenced in Rainmaker. Select the pairing number and the last column shown (ActDur) is the OUT-IN time for the flight.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Q: What times should the pilots use for their logbooks?
A: The pilots should use the ACARS (OUT-IN) times for logbook times (as they do today). If that is not available, the logbook time can be referenced in Rainmaker. Select the pairing number and the last column shown (ActDur) is the OUT-IN time for the flight.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
04-20-2018 | 08:56 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Union and company.... When they both agree it must be right...
Q: What times should the pilots use for their logbooks?
A: The pilots should use the ACARS (OUT-IN) times for logbook times (as they do today). If that is not available, the logbook time can be referenced in Rainmaker. Select the pairing number and the last column shown (ActDur) is the OUT-IN time for the flight.
Q: What times should the pilots use for their logbooks?
A: The pilots should use the ACARS (OUT-IN) times for logbook times (as they do today). If that is not available, the logbook time can be referenced in Rainmaker. Select the pairing number and the last column shown (ActDur) is the OUT-IN time for the flight.
For what it's worth we DO have a direct answer from the company/union of which times they're using for tracking various items.
I still wouldn't log more than 8 or 9 flight hours in my logbook but I guess that's up to each of us.
04-20-2018 | 09:24 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 116
I think the union is just echoing the Company info, I don't think either of them have an FAA interpretation to support that.
For what it's worth we DO have a direct answer from the company/union of which times they're using for tracking various items.
I still wouldn't log more than 8 or 9 flight hours in my logbook but I guess that's up to each of us.
For what it's worth we DO have a direct answer from the company/union of which times they're using for tracking various items.
I still wouldn't log more than 8 or 9 flight hours in my logbook but I guess that's up to each of us.
04-20-2018 | 09:37 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
04-20-2018 | 10:31 AM
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 107
Literally every pilot I've ever flown with logs block.
Also, I hope no one logged Hobbs time when they went through flight training, instructing, or cargo... Since it's almost universally based on battery on with engine running and has nothing to do with movement.
In my decade as a flight instructor I've never met someone that logged movement time in GA. Furthermore, the FAA reps I worked with logged and approved Hobbs logging.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Also, I hope no one logged Hobbs time when they went through flight training, instructing, or cargo... Since it's almost universally based on battery on with engine running and has nothing to do with movement.
In my decade as a flight instructor I've never met someone that logged movement time in GA. Furthermore, the FAA reps I worked with logged and approved Hobbs logging.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
04-20-2018 | 10:55 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Literally every pilot I've ever flown with logs block.
Also, I hope no one logged Hobbs time when they went through flight training, instructing, or cargo... Since it's almost universally based on battery on with engine running and has nothing to do with movement.
In my decade as a flight instructor I've never met someone that logged movement time in GA. Furthermore, the FAA reps I worked with logged and approved Hobbs logging.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Also, I hope no one logged Hobbs time when they went through flight training, instructing, or cargo... Since it's almost universally based on battery on with engine running and has nothing to do with movement.
In my decade as a flight instructor I've never met someone that logged movement time in GA. Furthermore, the FAA reps I worked with logged and approved Hobbs logging.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
But now that the plane tracks (and supplies) exact 1.1, that's much shakier ground to stand on. Especially with the fact that out-in will give times greater than 117 allows. Do you really want to deal with the possibility of having to answer for why you logged more than 9 hours in one day?
04-20-2018 | 11:10 AM
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 107
Logging Hobbs time in GA, and out-in at the airlines, has been a close-enough approximation to 1.1 that has been generally accepted without the FAA bringing up the discrepancy.
But now that the plane tracks (and supplies) exact 1.1, that's much shakier ground to stand on. Especially with the fact that out-in will give times greater than 117 allows. Do you really want to deal with the possibility of having to answer for why you logged more than 9 hours in one day?
But now that the plane tracks (and supplies) exact 1.1, that's much shakier ground to stand on. Especially with the fact that out-in will give times greater than 117 allows. Do you really want to deal with the possibility of having to answer for why you logged more than 9 hours in one day?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
04-20-2018 | 11:11 AM
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: CRJ900 Captain
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
