Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
#8261
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
The wording of that SSP was not good. Many of us questioned the union about it. Like the fact they promised Delta would take 144 /yr, then 180/yr, etc., (12/month avg increasing to 15/month) or X % of new hires. The problem many of us noticed was Delta could adjust their hiring #'s down, which they did slightly last year, and thus not be required to meet the 144.(because it was 144 or X% of newhires) Also, the 144 was a yearly commitment, therefore technically as long as all 144 were in training by Dec 31st, the requirement would be met.
#8262
The wording of that SSP was not good. Many of us questioned the union about it. Like the fact they promised Delta would take 144 /yr, then 180/yr, etc., (12/month avg increasing to 15/month) or X % of new hires. The problem many of us noticed was Delta could adjust their hiring #'s down, which they did slightly last year, and thus not be required to meet the 144.(because it was 144 or X% of newhires) Also, the 144 was a yearly commitment, therefore technically as long as all 144 were in training by Dec 31st, the requirement would be met.
#8263
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
#8264
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Funny how the American/USAir/AWest pilots think the flows are excellent and think that mainline American should be taking more flows. And I'm pretty sure they were all hired through an interview. Are Delta pilots somehow superior to them? It is after all the exact same job. No one at a WO regional (be it Endevaor or one of the AAG WOs) feels we "deserve" a job at mainline. But let's be real here. When someone buys a ticket on Delta or American, and the flight gets flown by their regional subsidiary, why are those pilots "good enough" to fly YOUR passengers at their regional under your brand, but not on your actual airplanes? The SSP that Endeavor has with Delta turns down many qualified applicants. Sometimes twice. But hey, it's okay, they can still fly your passengers around under your brand who bought tickets to fly on your airline. Sounds a little ludicrous doesn't it? I'm glad the culture at American isn't like that.
#8265
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
OK, so how many EDV pilots have been hired at DL since full time hiring began this time around (2014ish)?
How many EDV pilots have gotten hired elsewhere during that same time?
How many of those pilots would have ended up going to wherever else they went to anyway (because of bases, simply getting hired first, etc)?
How many EDV pilots have gotten hired elsewhere during that same time?
How many of those pilots would have ended up going to wherever else they went to anyway (because of bases, simply getting hired first, etc)?
#8266
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
How does a flow or lack of flow have anything to do with that?
They are concerned with very low time pilots (some who never upgraded anywhere) being Captain and flying with new hires. So they're giving more OE to be extra cautious.
The other airlines are going to be dealing with the exact same thing soon too. They're just a year or three behind with their mergers and upgrades.
#8267
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Cause you'd be wrong. But I'm sure they could go from 4 month upgrades to 10 year upgrades like UAL if only they had a regional flow wait that.
#8268
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 172
From: window seat
LOL um, this just happened. On paper only. On one bid. No one is even in the left seat at that seniority yet. Still waiting on training. So how can it be a "problem" if it hasn't even happened yet?
#8269
#8270
In that sense, yes. Either you are qualified to fly your brand's passengers or you are not. If not, you shouldn't be flying them in a Boeing or a Bombardier.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



