Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Contract 2018

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2018 | 07:35 AM
  #381  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Xjt still gets to line bid and keeps their trip touch vacation dealio. Ask an old Cal pilot about trip touch vacation and it usually brings back visions of awesomeness.
They get a raise to industry average and for the sheer majority of pilots that fly over 70 hours a month... another 8-10k for showing up.
They also get a guarantee of 20 E-175.

It's a win for XJT and should pass easy.
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 07:37 AM
  #382  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

These are all rounding errors.

The one thing I would be worried about is the potential $40,000 sign on bonus for new hires. Once this is voted in there will be no reason to come back to the bargaining table anytime soon. Giving up that leverage is something to think about very carefully.

The OO TA had a potential $30,000 new hire bonus - and that was one of the major reasons it failed so miserably (in addition to the left pocket right pocket shell game they were trying to play).

The rest of the TA is good news for XJT - just be careful in giving away future leverage.
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 07:44 AM
  #383  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Arliss
My biggest issue with the TA is that there were zero improvements to the trip credit rules. We have a measly 2 hour daily guarantee and 15 hour rig on 4 day trips only. You will frequently see fragments of trips that scheduling drops into open time that are terrible credit. 3 hours of credit for a 2 day!?!?! (one leg to a nearby outstation, overnight, 1 leg back). That's horrendous. If you straight pickup then yea, it's 3.75 per day. But if I want to use it for a swap, fuggetaboutit.

At a minimum the 4 day trip rig (works out to 3.75/day average) needs to be extended to all pairings. A 4 to 1 trip rig on top of that would be nice too.
Hmm. Doesn't the LASA side have a daily min, not an average, of 3:52.
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 08:11 AM
  #384  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight
Skywest pilots are chiming in because we have been offered TAs with misleading information several times recently- one of which was barely voted in, and one which failed miserably.

The dividing of the bonus to an hourly rate as people were discussing is a clear example- it is being calculated at 70 hours which is artificially high per hour, as most people will probably credit much more each month.

Actually, it’s being calculated at 80 hours. And these charts are not produced or paid for by management like they are at Skywest. These charts were produced by ALPA E&FA and Comm professional staff.

These charts and the EQO calculated pay rate were just to illustrate an apples to apples comparison to pay rates. If you or any other Skywest pilots don’t like them, you can calculate total compensation by multiplying the hourly rate by the minimum guarantee and then by 12 months, then add the $10k/$8k for xjt in order to compare.

Assumptions are made in every graph and chart that compares contracts. We all know that pay rates are just part of the total compensation picture.
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 08:14 AM
  #385  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Is offline
Because jk one should be voting in subpar TA’s. During the vote at OO half of the post were XJT drum beaters. It’s an insult they offer xjt less than they offered OO and you guys think it’s a good deal. Both deals were well below republic and endeavor.

This TA is better than the TA Skywest rejected. And the compensation is only bested by Endeavor. The charts are posted above.

Anyway, xjt rejected their concessionary contract years ago before Skywest had accepted their pay proposals with measly pay rate increases.
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 09:15 AM
  #386  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets
This TA is better than the TA Skywest rejected. And the compensation is only bested by Endeavor. The charts are posted above.

Anyway, xjt rejected their concessionary contract years ago before Skywest had accepted their pay proposals with measly pay rate increases.
Republic gets a sizable raise January. This is well below that
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 10:17 AM
  #387  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Default

Always turn down the first offer. You can do better. They are trying to use you as leverage for OO's TA. Think about Republics new rates.. start there.
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 10:27 AM
  #388  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default Contract 2018

Originally Posted by Is offline
Republic gets a sizable raise January. This is well below that

I didn’t know that. So xjt will be third out of a dozen? What is the percentage of their raise?
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 11:03 AM
  #389  
CaseTractor's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Air Force
10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 426
Likes: 2
From: Pipers!
Default EQO and Military Monthly duties

Originally Posted by 81618
Also want to put it out there that if you leave before an eqo payout you lose out on that "pay" you thought you had and got stuck with the dismal rates for the hours you did fly in that quarter.

"O. Earned Quarterly Override
1. Eligibility
For an XJT First Officer or Captain to be eligible for the XJT Earned Quarterly
Override (EQO) the pilot must remain employed through the last day of the
month in the quarter for which the EQO is being paid:
Example: For the EQO being paid in April, the pilot must remain employed
through March 31 (which is the last day of the quarter from January to
March)."

There is too much weight being put into the eqo for me, especially for a more senior FO. It would have been nice to see more of a balance between rates and an eqo. A $3,700 dollar rate increase (6 yr FO) for the year vs 10k for an eqo seems a little lopsided.
This is a huge player. It is assumed the vast majority of people can easily credit 70 hours. But what are the real numbers of people that do? It might be a higher percentage of people missing that mark (not deliberately) than most expect, hence why this is in there.

For example, how does this work for military? The average ANG or Reservist needs 6 days a month to do the one weekend a month/two weeks a year plus training periods. Military being on reserve cannot makeup credit with 11-12 days off to reach 70 hours again after taking military leave. A lineholder might, but then they are working doubly hard, and loosing time off just to be on par pay with the rest of the pilot group. Loosing a set credit for time off is much more fair with an appropriate hourly rate than this goofy conditional lump sum payments junk.

Is there a clause to help military, or was this completely overlooked? What about a commuter who misses reserve days? There are probably other conditions I am not aware of that can cause people to dip below 70 against their will or control. Thoughts?
Reply
Old 09-13-2018 | 11:25 AM
  #390  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaseTractor
This is a huge player. It is assumed the vast majority of people can easily credit 70 hours. But what are the real numbers of people that do? It might be a higher percentage of people missing that mark (not deliberately) than most expect, hence why this is in there.

For example, how does this work for military? The average ANG or Reservist needs 6 days a month to do the one weekend a month/two weeks a year plus training periods. Military being on reserve cannot makeup credit with 11-12 days off to reach 70 hours again after taking military leave. A lineholder might, but then they are working doubly hard, and loosing time off just to be on par pay with the rest of the pilot group. Loosing a set credit for time off is much more fair with an appropriate hourly rate than this goofy conditional lump sum payments junk.

Is there a clause to help military, or was this completely overlooked? What about a commuter who misses reserve days? There are probably other conditions I am not aware of that can cause people to dip below 70 against their will or control. Thoughts?
It’s a 70 hours/month average in a quarter or 210 hours credit/quarter.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Flyrr
Flexjet
20
04-30-2018 08:00 AM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices