What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?
05-22-2013 | 01:23 PM
#3071
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Grounded
Yes it is a regional and I understand the regional model. Every year, regardless of years of service, people in management positions get a percentage raise. I am not asking for their pay or their percentage, since I'm not doing their work (whatever "work" that might be).
All I am saying is that a lot of us have been sitting right seat for a while and might continue to do so. If that is the case, bump the FO longevity up anywhere between 2-5% till 10 years. I'm sure that the company can afford that since the pay raises for management is usually more every year. Not only will this benefit us if we don't upgrade, this will also help those that are below us.
All I am saying is that a lot of us have been sitting right seat for a while and might continue to do so. If that is the case, bump the FO longevity up anywhere between 2-5% till 10 years. I'm sure that the company can afford that since the pay raises for management is usually more every year. Not only will this benefit us if we don't upgrade, this will also help those that are below us.
05-22-2013 | 02:07 PM
#3072
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat Spouse
Yes it is a regional and I understand the regional model. Every year, regardless of years of service, people in management positions get a percentage raise. I am not asking for their pay or their percentage, since I'm not doing their work (whatever "work" that might be).
All I am saying is that a lot of us have been sitting right seat for a while and might continue to do so. If that is the case, bump the FO longevity up anywhere between 2-5% till 10 years. I'm sure that the company can afford that since the pay raises for management is usually more every year. Not only will this benefit us if we don't upgrade, this will also help those that are below us.
All I am saying is that a lot of us have been sitting right seat for a while and might continue to do so. If that is the case, bump the FO longevity up anywhere between 2-5% till 10 years. I'm sure that the company can afford that since the pay raises for management is usually more every year. Not only will this benefit us if we don't upgrade, this will also help those that are below us.
05-22-2013 | 03:17 PM
#3073
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Originally Posted by ross9238:1413916
There's plenty for me and it doesn't have to be in the form of a pay raise. I'll keep the current rates, nothing lower. If anything, seeing as how most of us will probably have mainline upgrade times here, they need to increase the pay cap on the FO side by a few more years - say about 10th year. I would like to see more hard language written into the contract and not the company can, shall, could, would, should or whatever else is there. I don't know if this could be done but there has to be something written in the contract for the grievance process as well. It should be resolved in two weeks and nothing longer than that time period. There are others but you get the picture.
Management needs to look at all other areas of the operation to be cost competitive than its front line employees.
05-22-2013 | 03:43 PM
#3074
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: The one that holds the thingy that moves the doo-hickie, and keeps the other thing from falling down
05-22-2013 | 03:44 PM
#3075
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Reclined seat
I just got done with recurrent training, and the ALPA word when we had lunch that our dues paid for said that we will have a TA to vote on within 90-100 days. The PBS/scheduling thing is worked out, and they were meeting with the company on Friday and Monday (most recently) to discuss financials.
05-22-2013 | 03:46 PM
#3076
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
I just got done with recurrent training, and the ALPA word when we had lunch that our dues paid for said that we will have a TA to vote on within 90-100 days. The PBS/scheduling thing is worked out, and they were meeting with the company on Friday and Monday (most recently) to discuss financials.
05-22-2013 | 04:33 PM
#3077
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Captain
I just got done with recurrent training, and the ALPA word when we had lunch that our dues paid for said that we will have a TA to vote on within 90-100 days. The PBS/scheduling thing is worked out, and they were meeting with the company on Friday and Monday (most recently) to discuss financials.
05-22-2013 | 04:56 PM
#3078
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,531
Likes: 0
From: FO4LIFE
I just got done with recurrent training, and the ALPA word when we had lunch that our dues paid for said that we will have a TA to vote on within 90-100 days. The PBS/scheduling thing is worked out, and they were meeting with the company on Friday and Monday (most recently) to discuss financials.
05-22-2013 | 06:21 PM
#3079
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,143
Likes: 203
I just got done with recurrent training, and the ALPA word when we had lunch that our dues paid for said that we will have a TA to vote on within 90-100 days. The PBS/scheduling thing is worked out, and they were meeting with the company on Friday and Monday (most recently) to discuss financials.
05-22-2013 | 06:41 PM
#3080
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
I just got done with recurrent training, and the ALPA word when we had lunch that our dues paid for said that we will have a TA to vote on within 90-100 days. The PBS/scheduling thing is worked out, and they were meeting with the company on Friday and Monday (most recently) to discuss financials.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
