Search
Notices

Frontier Hiring.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2017, 04:28 PM
  #7161  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Default

Is anybody else interviewing on the 14?
Pilot5510 is offline  
Old 03-08-2017, 05:39 PM
  #7162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mugatu's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
I personally think any merger is a ways down the road. There is no real reason to merge Frontier and spirit right now. Both are profitable and growing organically.

I believe we will merge someday, maybe during the next recession, but not in the next few years. There hasn't even been any progress on the IPO yet
Yeah, I agree.
Mugatu is offline  
Old 03-08-2017, 06:40 PM
  #7163  
Last To Know First To Go
 
TurboFanMan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 605
Default

Frontier Airlines adds new nonstop flights from Dulles | WTOP
TurboFanMan is offline  
Old 03-08-2017, 06:44 PM
  #7164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Swing that gear
Posts: 354
Default

They will continue to pocket what they make with each delivery this year, then when deliveries slow down I think they will look seriously at an IPO. Bet talk will start early 18 again. Just my 2 cents.

Wish we were sold yesterday but I bet the asking price got ridiculous after the Virgin sale.
Yabadaba is offline  
Old 03-08-2017, 10:28 PM
  #7165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
madmax757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: seated - facing forward
Posts: 995
Default New Vegas Routes

Here's an article about the Vegas expansion from a Vegas newspaper. Interesting point - Last paragraph says we will have more departures than Spirit with this expansion. Spirit has a base here with about 100 pilot crews according to my friend that works there.

Apparently we are now using 2 different hotels because hotel one cant accept any more crews.

Frontier Airlines adding 16 new flights to Las Vegas schedule this summer | Las Vegas Review-Journal
madmax757 is offline  
Old 03-09-2017, 04:49 AM
  #7166  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: Airbus Captain
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by AncientAliens View Post
THIS!

Delta, Southwest, and Hawaiian (if they ratify) all got significant retro. From what I've heard on the line I don't think our NC has made it a high priority. I hope that changes as negotiations drag on. The company needs to know there are consequences for their bad behavior with concern to the current and future contracts.
Bad behavior? Exactly what bad behavior has the company engaged in? Our current contract was negotiated and agreed on by the pilot group and wasn't amendable until 3-17, which is now.

I think people here confuse "bad behavior," with the company simply following the contract, that was agreed on by the pilot group. (I will say I know not everyone thinks the company follows the contract, but I think a lot of the people here who have these issues bring it on themselves. I am a line holding Captain and I have never once had the contract violated by the company.) There is never an excuse for the company to not follow the contract, and that's why we have a grievance process in place.

People at this airline forget that WE agreed to our work rules that are currently in place. Are some of them outdated? Yes. Do some of them need to be changed? Yes, but I am frankly tired of hearing about it.

I get asked by practically every FO I fly with about the contract, and I always say the same thing. Logically, a new contract will happen. This is the business we are in. The company is just doing what any good management team does when negotiating with their employees, this is part of the game. A "good" management group wants to make money, no airline, or any other company is in it for employee charity, they are in it to make money. Simple capitalism. I thought most pilots were republicans? Which, in my opinion, is in itself an oxymoron, being so pro-labor, but belonging to a group who is notoriously anti-labor. But, that's a different post entirely.

It's all pretty simple honestly, we will get a new contract and we will get a raise. Great. Let's move on.
A319 is offline  
Old 03-09-2017, 05:08 AM
  #7167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 123
Default

I think the tired line of "they're just doing what they're supposed to" or "mgmt's job is to get us to fly for free" is a HUGE disservice to employees everywhere and a gross rationalizing of incompetent and greedy "me first/I got mine" executives.

There have been and still are today plenty of companies that provide great jobs with good pay and wonderful benefits, I.e. treat their employees well and yet still make massive profits. A GOOD company does NOT make its profits at the EXPENSE of its employees.

Historically there's even been a few airlines who've managed to figure out that formula for at least a time. See FedEx pre-flying tigers merger or Southwest in its heyday.

A really good management team realizes that their employees are an asset to be taken care of and that providing good qol thru pay and benefits generates happy employees who are more productive, provide better service, and generate sustainable long term profits. The problem is so many executive, bod's and shareholders these days don't care about long term. It's all me me me NOW NOW NOW.


EDIT: also, if you're a line holding captain you've been here for at least 3+ years. If you say they've never violated the contract on you I'd easily bet you just don't know the contract as well as you probably should.
Mesabi is offline  
Old 03-09-2017, 05:52 AM
  #7168  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: Airbus Captain
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabi View Post
I think the tired line of "they're just doing what they're supposed to" or "mgmt's job is to get us to fly for free" is a HUGE disservice to employees everywhere and a gross rationalizing of incompetent and greedy "me first/I got mine" executives.

There have been and still are today plenty of companies that provide great jobs with good pay and wonderful benefits, I.e. treat their employees well and yet still make massive profits. A GOOD company does NOT make its profits at the EXPENSE of its employees.

Historically there's even been a few airlines who've managed to figure out that formula for at least a time. See FedEx pre-flying tigers merger or Southwest in its heyday.

A really good management team realizes that their employees are an asset to be taken care of and that providing good qol thru pay and benefits generates happy employees who are more productive, provide better service, and generate sustainable long term profits. The problem is so many executive, bod's and shareholders these days don't care about long term. It's all me me me NOW NOW NOW.


EDIT: also, if you're a line holding captain you've been here for at least 3+ years. If you say they've never violated the contract on you I'd easily bet you just don't know the contract as well as you probably should.
The term "good," when being used to describe a company, or an airline is totally subjective. I am not arguing whether or not this company is "good" or not, but if you are judging solely based on finances, one would probably use that word to describe it.

I think they key to your post is understanding that the airlines you mentioned WERE PREVIOUSLY pilot friendly and offered tremendous benefits, but everyone has realized that they can no longer compete, especially with the ULCC's by doing so.

I want to make sure I am not misunderstood in this post, I am very much pro-labor and very much in favor of a new contract and industry standard wages, but if anyone thinks we will get paid more than Delta (I have heard this on the line), they are wrong and seriously misinformed.

Yes, I have been here much longer than 3 years and know the contract very well. Most pilots here, however, do not know the contract well enough though, and that is a good point. You must have a pretty pessimistic view if you automatically think that because I have been here a while the contract must have been violated, but I was just too stupid to know. I don't think that is fair. I also believe that optimism plays a lot into interpretation. Then, you probably won't believe me when I say I have NEVER EVER gotten a call from the CPs office either, for anything, ever. If you show up to work on time, keep your head down and do your job, no one notices you, I like it that way.

More times than not, it seems, the pilots who run into trouble bring it on themselves.
A319 is offline  
Old 03-09-2017, 05:59 AM
  #7169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: ce560
Posts: 231
Default

I agree with most of what's being said with the exception of the fact that we will never see industry leading pay.
If we strike there is zero reason to return to work for anything but industry leading. Just like Spirit did.
Unfortunately indigo knows this and why I think they will cave at 11:59....
singlepilot is offline  
Old 03-09-2017, 08:03 AM
  #7170  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 78
Default

Every pilot on property has seen the company violate the contract. See LOA 67 negotiations, or lack thereof.

This, in contrast to JetBlue, which recently negotiated interim payraises and profit sharing in advance of a full CBA.

Couple this with the post-outsourcing operation, and total lack of accountability for the environment they have created, and that's why most pilots don't have any faith in this management team. It's not just the section 6 process.
HacksawDuggan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Frontier
15
07-24-2011 07:07 PM
lolwut
Major
24
12-01-2010 03:21 AM
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
3
09-29-2005 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices