Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Gojet!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2009 | 05:54 PM
  #91  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: June Bug SIC
Default Question

Originally Posted by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Well, if you do take a job there then you ARE in fact promoting the management practices. We can agree or disagree on many things but there is no doubt that each and every Gojet pilot hired has "promoted the practices of Gojet management" by simply getting hired - simply put they let the management win their case...

I am no longer a regional pilot and I realize it's 'easy for me' to have an opinion since the TSA/Gojet situation doesn't directly affect me. However, in my view, when a company violates an agreement with the union by creating an alter-ego "company within a company" then the whole idea of belonging to a union pretty much goes out the window. The only purpose of Gojet's existence is so management could avoid having to deal with TSA's union...

Why would the management for any airline want to follow a contract when it's so much simpler to create a 'separate' company and impose the rules on it's employees?

Note - by no means am I a union fanatic however, I think the idea of TSA pilots being furloughed while Gojet keeps hiring is very distasteful to the least. It also proves that pilots will always be their own worst enemies.

Fire away...
ok... I'm new to this arument and have never been a union member. However, I have done a little research on this subject. And, after applying a little logic, I have a question or two.

If a company such as trans states wants to keep pace with the rest of the industry and operate more profitable 70 seaters, how could it do this if its current contract with American prohibits it from operating an aircraft with more than 50 seats? Well, it could start another company in order to go around its contract with American and start operating the 70 seaters it wants to operate.

It seams to me that the purpose of creating Gojet was not to circumvent its contract with ALPA; it was to circumvent its contract with American. It seams to me, if Gojet were to combine the seniority list and treat both pilot groups as one, it would be defeating its entire purpose by admitting that it is basically the same company as TSA, and Trans States would then probably run into legal problems with TSA's contract with American, which prohibits it from operating 70 seaters.

Unless I am missing something (in which case I'm sure some of you will waist no time in pointing out), Trans States is between a rock and a hard place: If they make the pilot's happy they will be jeapordizing their ability to operate the planes they want, but if they take the steps necessary to operate the planes they want then they are ****ing off the pilot's. If I were them, in this case, I wouldn't worry about who I was ****ing off and would do what was in the company's best interest.
Old 01-21-2009 | 06:04 PM
  #92  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

No, they could do exactly what Republic has done and operate different certificates with pilots on the same seniority list instead of paying much less to fly a larger jet on a contract that was signed YEARS after TSA's.
Old 01-21-2009 | 06:22 PM
  #93  
blastoff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by JJOSH122
its current contract with American prohibits it from operating an aircraft with more than 50 seats?
It doesn't. It only prevents them from operating jets with more than 50 for American...capiche?
Old 01-21-2009 | 06:26 PM
  #94  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: June Bug SIC
Default

Help me wrap my brain around this...

Trans States spent the money to create Gojet in order to screw TSA pilot's, right? Why then are they paying Gojet's pilots more money than TSA pilots?

TSA Pay Rate: Gojet Pay Rate:
Year CAPT FO Year CAPT FO
1 55 22 1 60 23
2 57 25 2 61 30
3 59 32 3 63 34
4 60 33 4 65 35
5 62 35 5 66 35
Old 01-21-2009 | 07:03 PM
  #95  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Because TSA's CBA was agreed to many years ago. Gojet's was in 2006. The teamsters local (one that represents gas station attendants in St. Louis) was only voted in after the original guys got tired of bare 121 time limitations and having their days off at outstations.

If you compare Gojet to other 70 seat operators they're far below. And block pay is only one small part of the equation. If you have a hard time wrapping your brain around that, you have a lot to learn.

Last edited by Pilotpip; 01-21-2009 at 07:10 PM.
Old 01-21-2009 | 07:11 PM
  #96  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: June Bug SIC
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip
Because TSA's CBA was agreed to many years ago. Gojet's was in 2006.

Regardless of when the contracts were agreed to, the rates posted in my last post are current pay rates.


If you compare Gojet to other 70 seat operators they're far below.

Many operators do not differentiate between 70 seaters and smaller capacity planes when it comes to pay rate.


And block pay is only one small part of the equation.
I will conceed this point if you can point out other areas in Gojet's compensation package that are inferior to TSA'a.
Old 01-21-2009 | 07:15 PM
  #97  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: June Bug SIC
Default

Originally Posted by blastoff
It doesn't. It only prevents them from operating jets with more than 50 for American...capiche?
This is not true according to the mediation board's investigation.

the board's report, under the section "statement of facts", says...

"TSA’s fleet is composed entirely of aircraft that fly 50 or fewer passengers. American has the right to terminate its contract with TSA if it operates any aircraft with more than 50 seats."
Old 01-21-2009 | 07:19 PM
  #98  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by JJOSH122
I will conceed this point if you can point out other areas in Gojet's compensation package that are inferior to TSA'a.
The fact that the contract is much newer yet has only slight raises is proof enough. The health bennefits are the same, and they are horrible at both airlines. For a contract that was ratified years after TSA's and lower than many 70 seat contracts signed during bankruptcies it's pretty pathetic.
Old 01-21-2009 | 07:28 PM
  #99  
flyinaway411's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default

what are you not getting man. republic operates for american as well, as chautauqua. then they operate 70 seaters under another certificate. but the pilot group is one whole group. not multiple groups, but one. maybe a judge ruled a certain way, but there are ethically and morally correct ways to operate a business. As a TSA pilot for more than 2 yrs now, I can tell you Trans States Holdings does nothing ethically or morally. creating gojets and more specifically not having tsa pilots fly them at comparable rates is just an example of that.
Old 01-21-2009 | 07:31 PM
  #100  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Or perhaps you could look at Pinnacle. They operate 70+ seat turbojets for Northwest which wouldn't be allowed by their codeshare with Continental. That's where Colgan comes in.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkyHigh
GoJet
179
02-09-2009 07:14 AM
AirWillie
GoJet
68
09-11-2006 07:31 PM
CRJammin
GoJet
35
01-15-2006 04:46 AM
RockBottom
GoJet
5
11-03-2005 09:36 PM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
3
10-14-2005 07:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices