Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Representation Discussion >

Delta Representation Discussion

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Representation Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2013 | 10:13 AM
  #521  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Gosh I hope not. I only got 3 years left!

Carl
My bad, the whale is supposed to fly west in 2017.
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 10:42 AM
  #522  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg52
Funny, that's the same thought I get from reading acl's and hitimefurl's posts.
Not desperate at all. Just growing tired of people not seeing that coordination not conflict is the way to go. That would be internally within our pilot group and within our profession.
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 10:45 AM
  #523  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The "glaring flaws" hyperbole is over emotional dude. DPA edited the constitution to clarify that the maximum dues rate even during special circumstances is still lower than ALPA's dues rate.

Carl
No they didn't they wrote a contradiction. If the DPA got voted in next October the dues would be 1.75% for Section 6 and would go up .5% for Section 6 but then never exceed 1.5%??? 1.75 is already a larger number than 1.5...!?

The dues rate shall be 1.75% upon initial certification by the National Mediation Board. On January 1st of the second full fiscal year following initial certification, the dues rate shall drop annually by 0.25% every year until reaching a minimum dues rate of 1%.

Special Circumstance Exception: Six (6) months prior to the amendable date of the Pilot Working Agreement, or upon early opening of negotiations if greater than six (6) months prior to the amendable date, or upon notification of a possible bankruptcy or merger initiated by the Company, the dues rate will temporarily increase by 0.5%, not to exceed 1.5% in total dues rate, until the new contract is ratified, or bankruptcy proceedings or merger integration is complete. Upon completion, all expenses for the Special Circumstance will be fully accounted for and any remaining funds and any accrued interest from the 0.5% temporary increase will be refunded to the membership on a pro rata basis.

Exception: During the initial three year transition, while the base dues rate is above 1% for the buildup of union finances, refunds are not mandatory, but may be given at the discretion of the Executive Board.
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 10:46 AM
  #524  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The "glaring flaws" hyperbole is over emotional dude. DPA edited the constitution to clarify that the maximum dues rate even during special circumstances is still lower than ALPA's dues rate.

But since your into noticing glaring flaws, how about that bit of truth the MEC put out recently about the fact that we are not going to meet the percentages in the Atlantic Joint Venture. The MEC letter put out their version of the truth when they said: 'it's not our fair share of the flying anyway.' After a huge outcry from the members for saying that it wasn't our fair share of the flying, the MEC retracted their version of the truth and put out a statement saying that the Delta pilots' fair share of the flying is exactly the percentages we agreed to in our JV agreement. Two very different statements from our MEC. I maintain the first one was their truth, and the second one was MEC spin based on the torches and pitchforks getting too close.

Carl
Carl;

In collective bargaining, fair share is nothing more than whatever we negotiate. We are worth what we negotiate. If anything it was an oversight that the MEC agreed was the wrong impression and was not the best choice of words. They changed it and are willing to correct it. Id say say that is a good sign.

As for the TAJV projections and trend. Its a message, we are watching closely and though not a PWA violation today, we are very very aware of where it is going. We are not allowing something outside the PWA today. March 2015 is the drop deal of measurement and cure.

On Dues: What the BOD decide at the last meeting? A purposeful measured reduction to 1.35% that does not cause harm to the ability to do the work that is needed to be done.

You do know that we are fighting a battle that will result in a sustained industry for the next generation or one that fails to exist on any meaningful level? Do you support ALPA PAC? If not, I will send you a link to donate even five bucks a pay period.
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 11:16 AM
  #525  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Not desperate at all. Just growing tired of people not seeing that coordination not conflict is the way to go. That would be internally within our pilot group and within our profession.
I would like ALPA National to take a role as a professional society similar to the AMA, rather than that of the union. If you pay dues to an organization for many years, you expect some form of loyalty. It just doesn't sit well with me that a group of pilots that were in ALPA for about a year, are ahead of me on the list simply because they voted in ALPA at the right time.
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 01:20 PM
  #526  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg52
Funny, that's the same thought I get from reading acl's and hitimefurl's posts.
Of course, anyone's opinion can be influenced by whose ox is being gored.

Before I say anything, I want to differentiate between pilots who may have joined DPA and the DPA leadership. After a decade of pain and an industry that has been restructured and rebuilt while we experienced first hand that nasty roller coaster, I understand how pilots are frustrated and angry. In my opinion the majority of pilots that call themselves "DPA" are just tired of this ride and are looking for something, anything to make it all go away. They are not DPA they are line dogs looking for a better career and I have no quarrel with them in fact I feel their pain also. I still strongly believe that ALPA is the best vehicle to rebuild their careers.

The DPA leadership have shown themselves to be uniquely dishonest and manipulative. They have tried to exploit this frustration and anger to further their own self interested policies. Note how the DPA has set up their new union to richly reward themselves with flight pay far beyond what any DALPA officer gets. Many of these guys are angry beyond rational thought. What sticks out is the glaring lack of integrity as they use half truths, manipulation, and outright lies to try to win support. When Carl doesn't have a fact, he just makes something up.

The DPA leadership knows their movement is dead and now they are on a scorched earth rampage to try and destroy everything around them. Their claim of 5500 members is ludicrous. Look around the system, do you see DPA discussions in the lounge, do you see DPA organizational meetings, do you see a vibrant and concerned committee membership trying to better pilots' lives? All I see are a bunch of lies on a website, mostly cooked up by their lawyer, to try to character assassinate ALPA and anyone associated with it. They have a few perpetual cranks on the ALPA forum who hijack every thread with their non stop idiocy. Now apparently, Carl has been dispatched here to continue to crankdom on this forum. If they had 5500 active concerned members, you wouldn't be able to swing a dead cat in the pilot lounge without running into that organization. Even the Detroit pilot lounge is devoid of DPA activity and as a commuter I am there a lot.

So I do feel the desperation of Carl and Caplinger and the rest of the cranks. Their organization is dead. We've had timelines, countdown clocks, and a continuous drumbeat of impending doom from the DPA leadership and none of their lies has worked. Delta is hiring, our contract is moving forward, we will have had well over 400 new Captain upgrades by the time this bid closes, with many, many more to come. DCI is shrinking and mainline is growing. Their entire raison d'etre, the conflict between DCI and mainline, has been shown to be false as DCI is shrinking and mainline is growing and no one from ALPA thinks this is bad most especially the DCI carriers.

The only question is how much damage are these cranks going to do before they just slink back out of sight.
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 03:45 PM
  #527  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
The DPA leadership have shown themselves to be uniquely dishonest and manipulative.

What sticks out is the glaring lack of integrity as they use half truths, manipulation, and outright lies to try to win support. When Carl doesn't have a fact, he just makes something up.
For the lurkers here who may not know, alfaromeo used to be very high up in Delta's MEC administration. When our new MEC was elected recently, they voted out the MEC chairman and alfaromeo...among others. Shortly thereafter, alfaromeo posted this on the Delta L&G thread (bold emphasis mine):

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I run a consulting business and here is how a real business works. When they require me to be away from home I charge them for travel time to and from my home. I charge them for the hotel where I stay. I charge them for the airfare. I charge them for the meals. I charge them at least 8 hours a day or what I work. There is nothing that gets done for free. Conference call - charge it. Run a quick analysis at home - charge it. They gladly pay as this is the way business works.

My wife quit her job last year and my total income was up massively from 2011. That's because, even for only half a year, I charged someone every hour I worked. No more freebies. If I flew a trip then Delta paid the bill if I was working for my clients then they paid the bill. It is amazing how much more money you can make when you are not working for free. This year is going to be much better than the last. In 2011 my hours per month were in the bottom 30% of the pilot group, not this year. This April I will work half the number of hours I did last April and my pay will be double.

It is conversations like this that just make me even more happy that I am not doing ALPA work anymore. There is nothing more frustrating than putting in unpaid hour after unpaid hour and then being accused of being a thief by the people you are working for.

So please continue on with the ALPA bashing I know it makes you all very happy. I have work to do for my clients and yes they are getting charged for every minute. That is how real business works. It is so much more lucrative not having to work for free.
Imagine our surprise when we found out what alfaromeo's work was...who his client was. His client was the United MEC. His work was union work. He was hired at the request of Lee Moak to be a merger committee consultant for the United MEC during their SLI with the Continental pilots.

Knowing what you know now, re-read alfaromeo's post. Then decide for yourself whether he's in a position to say what he said in his top post. In particular, "uniquely dishonest and manipulative"...and "glaring lack of integrity as they use half truths, manipulation, and outright lies."

Carl
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 03:48 PM
  #528  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin
Unfortunately, unlike the NFL, I don't think you want to see Lee Moak in this pose:
Sorry photobucket not working. Imagine a Denver Bronco cheerleader bending over.
Point well taken.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 03:54 PM
  #529  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by 76drvr
When was the vote to change the C&BLs?

Apparently the top down structure of the DPA allows changing of their C&BLs without following their own process as outlined in their C&BLs. The DPA is already violating their own C&BLs. Simply priceless.

Section4 of the DPA C&BLs

"4. The Board of Directors may vote, by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of all Board members to submit permanent changes to the Constitution and By-Laws to the Executive Board for consideration. Proposed changes will be published to the membership thirty (30) days prior to approval/rejection by the Executive Board so that the membership is aware of potential changes and may make comment on the proposed changes. Upon approval by the Executive Board, all changes will be ratified by a membership vote.
5. Permanent changes to the Constitution and By-Laws require a Simple Majority Vote of the membership to pass.
6. Temporary changes or deviations from the Constitution and By-Laws are prohibited."
Originally Posted by 76drvr
When was the DPA membership notified of this change to the C&BLs?

Was there a vote, or did a group of "insiders" just decide what's best?
Dear 76drvr,

What you're quoting applies after the DPA gets voted in, not now. The C&BL's writing and editing will use this process after certification.

Best regards,

Carl
Reply
Old 09-13-2013 | 03:57 PM
  #530  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Carl;

In collective bargaining, fair share is nothing more than whatever we negotiate. We are worth what we negotiate. If anything it was an oversight that the MEC agreed was the wrong impression and was not the best choice of words. They changed it and are willing to correct it. Id say say that is a good sign.

As for the TAJV projections and trend. Its a message, we are watching closely and though not a PWA violation today, we are very very aware of where it is going. We are not allowing something outside the PWA today. March 2015 is the drop deal of measurement and cure.

On Dues: What the BOD decide at the last meeting? A purposeful measured reduction to 1.35% that does not cause harm to the ability to do the work that is needed to be done.

You do know that we are fighting a battle that will result in a sustained industry for the next generation or one that fails to exist on any meaningful level? Do you support ALPA PAC? If not, I will send you a link to donate even five bucks a pay period.
You don't get to keep asking questions while never answering them. I asked you a question twice so far regarding you writing a letter backing a resolution effort. Do you intend to answer?

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Rogue24
Major
104
06-15-2012 04:49 AM
pksocal
United
25
05-23-2012 02:29 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices