PSA info
09-16-2016 | 03:57 PM
#4051
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
The company screwed up by hiring DECs last year when in all honesty, you guys weren't really needed. And if the company had kept growing at the pace it was when you were hired, you very well should have been able to hold CLT quickly as a CA. With our new pay incentives and new found ability to hire, I think it likely our growth is not finished and you holding CLT would of been possible very shortly. Nonetheless, I wish you the best wherever you're off to next. Keep the blue side up buddy!
I hope for the sake of everyone staying that PSA is able to get their momentum going again. I've flown with some great pilots at PSA and that has definitely been the best part of a bad situation.
Best of luck to all!
09-16-2016 | 06:59 PM
#4057
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
09-16-2016 | 07:12 PM
#4058
On Reserve
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From a potential new hire standpoint, I would think it wouldn't make a lot of sense to have two wholly owns fighting over potential new hires at the same base (ORD). If Envoy could not attract an applicant to ORD, why would PSA having a base there suddenly change the applicants mind? Both PSA and Envoy offer nearly identical new hire packages. Why not offer a unique, yet commutable domicile, to attract potential new hires who are commuters?
09-16-2016 | 10:29 PM
#4059
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 146
From a potential new hire standpoint, I would think it wouldn't make a lot of sense to have two wholly owns fighting over potential new hires at the same base (ORD). If Envoy could not attract an applicant to ORD, why would PSA having a base there suddenly change the applicants mind? Both PSA and Envoy offer nearly identical new hire packages. Why not offer a unique, yet commutable domicile, to attract potential new hires who are commuters?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
