Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2014, 06:51 AM
  #5431  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
Default

$90/hr top out to fly a 175? Ygtbsm! That is just an insult. They are hoping the PDT guys are looking at it as just a raise rather than what it really is - Flying large RKs for PSA peanuts. This will set a new low bar for the industry, set by 350 pilots no less. Please PDT, stand with everyone else!
PilotCrusader is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 06:56 AM
  #5432  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Reverse Cowgirl
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by billyho View Post
Well if this deal is so crappy then it will reflect in the ability to get New Hires.
That's why airlines are unionized. New hires will go about anywhere. When one group builds up the industry by banding together then another offers something the newer people/weak pilots are "willing to put up with" it hurts everyone. So yes.. new hires will probably come but that doesn't mean it's a good deal.
QuagmireGiggity is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:11 AM
  #5433  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seafeye's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Hot tub for now
Posts: 1,203
Default

Being a wholly owned puts us at a great disadvantage. You can compare independent airlines to us.
seafeye is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:16 AM
  #5434  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: The Parlor
Posts: 1,243
Default

I bet PDT won't see the EJETS even if they vote this in, just a carrot.
MrMustache is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:31 AM
  #5435  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,131
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
There was a LOA proposal that was posted in EL sometime in the beginning of the year. It was a draft for a merger between Envoy and PDT. It had flow thru agreements and other things in it.

Like I said, how much damage would do a 355 people in a merge? Not that much, so for me it would be irrelevant. I rather have PDT guys joining us after a vote no, than bringing subpar wages and higher health care into the JBAC table.

Remember that concessions you give it won't come back, specially in a merger situation.

But that's just my point of view. I understand the "we will close you" sentiment and the fear of losing a job. Last decade it was possible and we saw it. Now this is a different decade, there's not a surplus of pilots going into the regionals.

It's your time to stand like you guys did before, now with the biggest regionals by your side. It's the only way to stop corporate greed.

Again, it's your guys decisions.
I agree

I've seen that proposed draft LOA and support the principle. Better to integrate than to have a new industry low created. Providing a lifeboat for eachother should be a goal on each ALPA property. I'm not sure about the PDT guys, but I'm pretty sick of being threatened with unemployment while my employer racks up $4 billion a year in profits while demanding concessions from pilots already on food stamps.

I get that it's a pay raise for all at PDT. What I don't get is setting a new industry low rate for an E175 when everybody else is flying them for:

RAH $116 (turned down contract offering $125)
SKW $114
CPZ $107
ENY $106 (same as CRJ700 rate from bankruptcy contract; new rates to be negotiated in 2016 for E175)
MESA $102 (CRJ900 rate is all I could find quickly)

The rate being offered to PDT is essentially the E145 rate at other regionals. .

Last edited by Cujo665; 08-31-2014 at 08:11 AM.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:37 AM
  #5436  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JT8D's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 618
Default

^^Cujo is one of our most active union reps at Eagle. The LOA does exist. We all know the merger is inevitable.

Vote no, stand up with the rest of us, and you will still be flying those 175's, but with a much better raise than what Jerry Glass is offering you now.

Plus, we WILL have your backs during the merger.
JT8D is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:38 AM
  #5437  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Reverse Cowgirl
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
I agree

I've seen that proposed draft LOA and support the principle. Better to integrate than to have a new industry low created. Providing a lifeboat for eachother should be a goal on each ALPA property. I'm pretty sick of being threatened with unemployment while my employer racks up $4 billion a year in profits while demanding concessions from pilots already on food stamps.

I get that it's a pay raise for all at PDT. What I don't get is setting a new industry low rate for an E175 when everybody else is flying them for:

RAH $116 (turned down contract offering $125)
SKW $114
CPZ $107
ENY $106 (same as CRJ700 rate from bankruptcy contract; new rates to be negotiated in 2016 for E175)
MESA $102 (CRJ900 rate is all I could find quickly)

The rate being offered to PDT is essentially the E145 rate at other regionals. .
Seems lower.
QuagmireGiggity is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:39 AM
  #5438  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,068
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
I agree

I've seen that proposed draft LOA and support the principle. Better to integrate than to have a new industry low created. Providing a lifeboat for eachother should be a goal on each ALPA property. I'm pretty sick of being threatened with unemployment while my employer racks up $4 billion a year in profits while demanding concessions from pilots already on food stamps.

I get that it's a pay raise for all at PDT. What I don't get is setting a new industry low rate for an E175 when everybody else is flying them for:

RAH $116 (turned down contract offering $125)
SKW $114
CPZ $107
ENY $106 (same as CRJ700 rate from bankruptcy contract; new rates to be negotiated in 2016 for E175)
MESA $102 (CRJ900 rate is all I could find quickly)

The rate being offered to PDT is essentially the E145 rate at other regionals. .
Excuse me sir. Rational and independent thinking has no place here.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:40 AM
  #5439  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: 747-400/-8 CA
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
I agree

I've seen that proposed draft LOA and support the principle. Better to integrate than to have a new industry low created. Providing a lifeboat for eachother should be a goal on each ALPA property. I'm pretty sick of being threatened with unemployment while my employer racks up $4 billion a year in profits while demanding concessions from pilots already on food stamps.

I get that it's a pay raise for all at PDT. What I don't get is setting a new industry low rate for an E175 when everybody else is flying them for:

RAH $116 (turned down contract offering $125)
SKW $114
CPZ $107
ENY $106 (same as CRJ700 rate from bankruptcy contract; new rates to be negotiated in 2016 for E175)
MESA $102 (CRJ900 rate is all I could find quickly)

The rate being offered to PDT is essentially the E145 rate at other regionals. .
This is the truth. We at Eagle are ready to stand strong with you guys.
Wano is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:56 AM
  #5440  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by QuagmireGiggity View Post
Seems lower.
No, $90 is about where 12 year 145 pay is. Top rates with longer caps are higher.
Bob Loblaw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices