Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Anything New At AWAC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2015 | 10:08 AM
  #631  
CAirBear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by akulahunter
Ah yes, simple math. Thanks! You are completely correct, on both counts.

It would be nice if that $50 was added to the annual uniform bank.
I could have sworn that the headset allowance was being added to our yearly uniform bank. Are you guys positive that it's not?
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 10:14 AM
  #632  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
I could have sworn that the headset allowance was being added to our yearly uniform bank. Are you guys positive that it's not?
Definitely not added to the uniform bank.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 10:15 AM
  #633  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: everywhere but nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
I could have sworn that the headset allowance was being added to our yearly uniform bank. Are you guys positive that it's not?

From the Bullet Point Summary

F. Headsets:

The paragraph that had a yearly headset accrual of $50.00 per year up to $300 was deleted.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 10:40 AM
  #634  
CAirBear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by TNDeltaFlyboy
From the Bullet Point Summary

F. Headsets:

The paragraph that had a yearly headset accrual of $50.00 per year up to $300 was deleted.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Ugh. The union guys need to get on the same page then. I listened to the call yesterday and I am, damn near positive, when the question came up about the headset bank, someone said it was tied in with the uniform bank and that the uniform bank is now $310 or something as opposed to $260.

My thoughts - while it sucks it's gone, it was kinda pointless to begin with. I've been here 2 years. I couldn't use it for another 4. *** knows if I'll be here by then. I don't know of many guys that used it and $300 is not buying you a legit nice headset to begin with.

I know everyone is ****ed about the insurance, but 2% is very minimal. As a single guy my PPO plan will increase literally $1.80 something a month. As for the guys who pays couple hundred, it's only $2-3 bucks.

The RSV rules sound much much better. I'll hopefully upgrade soon and I would love to, possibly, sit Long Call back home.

I know everyone wanted rates to go up, but it is what it is. The call yesterday made a good point. This thing can be opened back up in 1.5 years. By then, assuming we have new flying past '18, the hiring pool will be virtually next to nothing and that there would be extreme leverage.

It's a tough spot. If voted down I don't see us getting another TA at all. I could be wrong, but I just don't see it considering how long it took for this one.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 11:08 AM
  #635  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
Ugh. The union guys need to get on the same page then. I listened to the call yesterday and I am, damn near positive, when the question came up about the headset bank, someone said it was tied in with the uniform bank and that the uniform bank is now $310 or something as opposed to $260.

My thoughts - while it sucks it's gone, it was kinda pointless to begin with. I've been here 2 years. I couldn't use it for another 4. *** knows if I'll be here by then. I don't know of many guys that used it and $300 is not buying you a legit nice headset to begin with.

I know everyone is ****ed about the insurance, but 2% is very minimal. As a single guy my PPO plan will increase literally $1.80 something a month. As for the guys who pays couple hundred, it's only $2-3 bucks.

The RSV rules sound much much better. I'll hopefully upgrade soon and I would love to, possibly, sit Long Call back home.

I know everyone wanted rates to go up, but it is what it is. The call yesterday made a good point. This thing can be opened back up in 1.5 years. By then, assuming we have new flying past '18, the hiring pool will be virtually next to nothing and that there would be extreme leverage.

It's a tough spot. If voted down I don't see us getting another TA at all. I could be wrong, but I just don't see it considering how long it took for this one.
You should have applied at psa where everyone bends over willingly. A lot of us have used the headset bank so don't go thinking it's pointless. And nothing ever is what it is, so put your big boy pants on and start demanding more for your profession. You won't see another ta for 7 years if this is voted in. You should be sending the company and the regional dump of an industry a clear message you're worth more. Not this oh well ho hum crap attitude.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 11:12 AM
  #636  
Flubber's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 247
Likes: 1
From: Upside down, in the weeds and on fire
Default

Rumblings from Toontown that the company would like to see this get rejected. They're already salivating over some of the things they've seen in the MAG and TSA TAs.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 11:34 AM
  #637  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flubber
Rumblings from Toontown that the company would like to see this get rejected. They're already salivating over some of the things they've seen in the MAG and TSA TAs.
"This three-year agreement includes, among other improvements, annual cost-of-living pay increases for all pilots, a significant increase in first-year first officer pay, an increase to the per diem rate, a reduction to the percentage pilots pay for health insurance premiums, an increase to the company's 401(k) contributions, and a retention bonus."
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 11:58 AM
  #638  
Flubber's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 247
Likes: 1
From: Upside down, in the weeds and on fire
Default

Originally Posted by pitchtrim
"This three-year agreement includes, among other improvements, annual cost-of-living pay increases for all pilots, a significant increase in first-year first officer pay, an increase to the per diem rate, a reduction to the percentage pilots pay for health insurance premiums, an increase to the company's 401(k) contributions, and a retention bonus."
TSA's TA proposes health insurance contributions to go from 35% (or more) to 29% employee only or 34% employee + others. And, their 401(k) contribution caps at 4% but only at 7 years of service.

Their first year pay is better than what we're being offered... but that could be offset by the "training note" provision MAG has in their TA - and at Mesa, I don't think it's just for new hires but for captain upgrades as well. $13,000 I believe, and one year?

But hey, they get a signing bonus, and annual pay bump of 1.5%.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 01:21 PM
  #639  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flubber
Rumblings from Toontown that the company would like to see this get rejected. They're already salivating over some of the things they've seen in the MAG and TSA TAs.
Good. Those guys should vote No. Force the majors to bring the flying back in house or pay up. Dougie and the rest had enough multi million dollar bonuses made off our backs. Raise pay to a competative market price in line with the rest of the modern world.
Reply
Old 08-30-2015 | 09:09 PM
  #640  
akulahunter's Avatar
Voice of Reason
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Uncomfortable
Default

Ok, two points where I think we are looking at this the wrong way by letting the company/union frame the argument...

1. This TA is not concessionary. GREAT! Why would it be? All of the airlines are making record profits. Why would anyone take ANY concessions.

2. We are already the highest paid 50 seat outfit, what can we expect? Awesome! Why are we even discussing that? What we should be discussing is... when the company needed a concession the pilots gave concessions. The company doesn't need concessions now, our starting point should be the pre-concession rates plus 1.5% a year. Why are they fighting the restoration of the rates?

If the TA passes, my finacial benefit will be less than $750 ($1.77 x 80 hr/mo + $45/mo in per diem for 4 months). I'm sure I'll be able to make that up if we sign the contract we should be getting...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallFlyer
Regional
80
05-31-2013 03:34 PM
rustypilot
Regional
41
11-20-2007 08:28 PM
MS1095
Regional
8
09-11-2007 05:43 AM
46Pilot
Regional
28
05-31-2006 07:40 PM
saviboy
Regional
2
02-13-2006 11:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices