Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Old 04-16-2015, 08:55 PM
  #9681  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default Skywest

Originally Posted by Squallrider View Post
What does the Skywest pilots get with a merger? Nothing. Don't sprout the collective bargaining because no pilot group has leverage, all the alpa groups put together have no leverage as they fight each other. Union means unity and alpa at the regional level don't have that.
These are two separate issues. Like I said, you may make a case against why you feel a merger wouldn't be good for the pilots. But I'm talking about our ceo's penchant for making his employees work against each other. He touted the synergy benefits of an ASA/xjt merger that would only have compounded with a merger of all three. If he wanted all of us on the same team pulling together in one direction, there was nothing that Skywest pilots, ASA pilots, xjt pilots, or any front line employee could've done about it. So the fact that you may not feel it's a good long term viability solution doesn't mean that our CEO doesn't bow to the whipsaw culture. You get what I'm saying now?

Leverage? Yeah we may not have much but the fact that we have a contract does give us some leverage. For example, there was no discussion about EFBs possibly being used to reflow. Conversation didn't even come up, let alone the MEC deliberating it. The reason why? Leverage from our contract that doesn't allow them to even consider it. Also, after the TA vote, management told us it was a mistake to ask for concessions and so they are no longer asking for them. And now they have actually improved the xjt contract (slightly) and we are working together to negotiate a cost neutral PBS. That is just a couple of small examples of leverage solely from being union. So there is leverage to be had. Is it as much as we would like? No, of course not. There will always be outside uncontrolled influences that may impede that. And that goes for mainline pilots as well.

Originally Posted by Squallrider View Post
How did that workout for comair and envoy?

Pilot unions dont make business decisions or run the company. Short of a prolonged strike, they have nothing to do with management's ultimate decision to shutter a company or shrink it. If you think that pilot unions have that much power, then I don't know what to tell you.
Nevets is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 09:01 PM
  #9682  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned View Post
Yeah it is all your guys fault that my bonuses have went down!! Oh wait, I guess my low wages and lack of work rules allows Inc to purchases other airlines (i.e. Air Meekong) but if that would have made money, I'm positive they would have shared it with us pilots.

As soon as pilots realize that operations are such a small drop in the bucket, we won't see any significant gains in pay packages. Hell, I can give myself more of a raise on each trip by flying the block than I will get out of this upcoming offer. I have lost more than 2% in QOL each year just by SW making up their own interpretations of 117 and the PBS buffers they use. But since it cost them about $6 to have me sit at the airport for 4 hours, they will schedule the trips that way. There is no reason we should be this many years into 117 and not be able to stack trips.

Would any of this change with a union? Maybe not. But it really is tiresome to hear our pilot group act like it would put the company under to pay me for the hours I am away from my family. There is so much waste with duplicate management and outdated equipment (we still do payroll with an f'ing excel sheet), but whatever we do, let's not make any changes. Just keep telling the pilots how expensive they are.






They purchased 4 airlines, 3 of which have been money losers. They also have been doing stock buy-backs(for many years), which is considered by most to be a very poor use of corporate capital.
Paid2fly is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 05:18 AM
  #9683  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
This is complete BS. Unions have plenty of power on how businesses make decisions. Face it, unions are nothing short of a group of extortionists.
I have no idea why skywest pilots are so anti union.


Unions have done some wonderful thing for many pilot groups.

We're about to have EFBs given to us with mandatory notification and we have ZERO say about it. Is that cool to you guys?

The company has only played nice in the past because it was a significantly smaller company in a very good financial place.

Now it's a giant company that owns other companies and is only worried about the bottom line.

We as pilots need protection from the company, but also more importantly, from other workers within skywest. We need the union so the company can blame the union when we get a new pay package and other workers don't. When we get better insurance than other workers, or better 401k matching, or better FMLA, or better vacation accrual, or better moving expense reimbursement.

You name it, and it could be improved and the company just has to "blame the union" to other workers and that's fine. Right now we can't really get anything much better than other skywest employees.

Not saying we are better than other employees or more important, but giving rampers the same 401k match as pilots is a little crazy. Or in this case, giving us the same as them because our 401k match is nothing great.




Anyway, I am absolutely pro union, as to whether or not it would improve things, y'all can discuss. Until the senior guys start getting more and more screwed a union drive wouldn't work here, but that might be closer than we think
elmetal is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 06:42 AM
  #9684  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Broke
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post
I have no idea why skywest pilots are so anti union.


Unions have done some wonderful thing for many pilot groups.

We're about to have EFBs given to us with mandatory notification and we have ZERO say about it. Is that cool to you guys?

The company has only played nice in the past because it was a significantly smaller company in a very good financial place.

Now it's a giant company that owns other companies and is only worried about the bottom line.

We as pilots need protection from the company, but also more importantly, from other workers within skywest. We need the union so the company can blame the union when we get a new pay package and other workers don't. When we get better insurance than other workers, or better 401k matching, or better FMLA, or better vacation accrual, or better moving expense reimbursement.

You name it, and it could be improved and the company just has to "blame the union" to other workers and that's fine. Right now we can't really get anything much better than other skywest employees.

Not saying we are better than other employees or more important, but giving rampers the same 401k match as pilots is a little crazy. Or in this case, giving us the same as them because our 401k match is nothing great.




Anyway, I am absolutely pro union, as to whether or not it would improve things, y'all can discuss. Until the senior guys start getting more and more screwed a union drive wouldn't work here, but that might be closer than we think
There are a lot of Skywest pilots that would go for a union, but when they get on here and see post by people like nevets bashing us for riding their coattails. Post like that help nothing or no one. There is a lot of Skywest work rules that xjt would love to have, and there could be improvements.
Is offline is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 06:45 AM
  #9685  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post
I have no idea why skywest pilots are so anti union.


Unions have done some wonderful thing for many pilot groups.

We're about to have EFBs given to us with mandatory notification and we have ZERO say about it. Is that cool to you guys?

The company has only played nice in the past because it was a significantly smaller company in a very good financial place.

Now it's a giant company that owns other companies and is only worried about the bottom line.

We as pilots need protection from the company, but also more importantly, from other workers within skywest. We need the union so the company can blame the union when we get a new pay package and other workers don't. When we get better insurance than other workers, or better 401k matching, or better FMLA, or better vacation accrual, or better moving expense reimbursement.

You name it, and it could be improved and the company just has to "blame the union" to other workers and that's fine. Right now we can't really get anything much better than other skywest employees.

Not saying we are better than other employees or more important, but giving rampers the same 401k match as pilots is a little crazy. Or in this case, giving us the same as them because our 401k match is nothing great.




Anyway, I am absolutely pro union, as to whether or not it would improve things, y'all can discuss. Until the senior guys start getting more and more screwed a union drive wouldn't work here, but that might be closer than we think

No notification. Thats all some out of control rumor...
amcnd is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 06:54 AM
  #9686  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Caution Terrain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: PLEASE ADVISE
Posts: 339
Default

I worked for an ALPA carrier and it was fine. Before ALPA, not fine. It seems like everyone here is completely fear mongering over having representation. It's really not a bad deal.
Caution Terrain is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 07:30 AM
  #9687  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,221
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post

Anyway, I am absolutely pro union, as to whether or not it would improve things, y'all can discuss. Until the senior guys start getting more and more screwed a union drive wouldn't work here, but that might be closer than we think
This argument holds no water. There is 3500 pilots at SKYW and the senior pilots make up less than 10% of that, with say 60% of that 350 being on the no ALPA side of the fence. Insignificant.
trip is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 09:51 AM
  #9688  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
No notification. Thats all some out of control rumor...
Notification is off the table for now, but it was absolutely wanted by the company. The original proposal had it in there and SAPA removed it after feedback from the pilots. A serious question, where did you get that it was just a rumor?? Do you read the SAPA website? They wanted notification included on the EFB and the reflow policy implemented.
disillusioned is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 09:54 AM
  #9689  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
Oh give me a break...you think the pilot group gives a rats rectum about other groups within SkyWest? Come on pal, you don't really believe that do you?
You do realize that he was talking about how we are tied with pay and benefits to the other employee groups right? If we want a higher per diem, we can't get it because the flight attendants would get it. If we want higher 401k, we can't get it because all employees would get the higher 401k. If we had a union, we could ask for this and be separated from the other employee groups. Pilots don't care what other workgroups get, but we are tied to them for everything we ask for.
disillusioned is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 11:09 AM
  #9690  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: A320
Posts: 170
Default

Would love to know the numbers of those participating in the 401k that are not pilots.
FlyinRabbit88 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices