Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest v2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2017 | 08:40 AM
  #9421  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,895
Likes: 690
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
I heard it's a done deal for next year, you should be okay...
Originally Posted by Nevjets
It would literally require and act of Congress.
Not in the cards near-term, there's nothing happening in congress or at the FAA.

But it's an obvious and easy patch a few years down the road... lowering experience requirements is controversial at best. Letting experienced pilots stick around a bit longer is easy to justify if you can show statistically that 67 y/o pilots today are healthier than 60 y/o pilots were decades ago (when the age limit came about). Especially since Japan is already there.
Old 11-28-2017 | 07:10 PM
  #9422  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 418
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Anyone else notice our D:0 A:14 numbers have plummeted in the last month? We are spread pretty thin and it is starting to show!
Old 11-28-2017 | 08:37 PM
  #9423  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,395
Likes: 222
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Tippy
Anyone else notice our D:0 A:14 numbers have plummeted in the last month? We are spread pretty thin and it is starting to show!
Imagine what will happen when hiring slows. Time to pay up suckas!
Old 11-28-2017 | 10:32 PM
  #9424  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

The first of our next batch of Alaska E175 deliveries has arrived in BOI and the first of our new Delta E175 SCs will be coming in December. In total, we’ll take 45 E175s for Alaska and Delta between now and next fall.

Did something change?
Old 11-29-2017 | 03:00 AM
  #9425  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Hmmmmm....why don't you go ahead and fill us in on how these two would be tied together? Or, are we just making up stuff?
When they aren’t properly staffed and don’t have any reserves available, crew support starts calling people on their days off to beg them to take the trips. If they are having trouble finding a volunteer, the flight will be delayed until they do. Which affects the D:0 A:14 times.
Also, when running as thin as they are now, they don’t have reserves available to takeover when a crew will obviously be delayed all day. For example, a crew leaving an outstation has a maintenance problem. It takes 3 hours to resolve to problem. With their 6 leg day of quick turns, they don’t have any time to catch back up. When we have enough reserves, crew support could pull their next round trip, give it to reserves, and allow them to get back on schedule.

Last edited by RemoveB4Flight; 11-29-2017 at 03:10 AM.
Old 11-29-2017 | 03:20 AM
  #9426  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
OK, let me rephrase this. Where is the proof that these numbers are being directly impacted by crew issues.
I promise you it is. I get calls on almost every off day I have. When they call, I don’t answer, but I look at open time and it is very obvious that they have staffing problems.
If you’re looking for printed proof from the company admitting that their delays are coming from lack of staffing, you won’t find that. They don’t like to admit it because lack of pilots gives us leverage (not that we do anything with leverage anyway #onepercent). But if you’re paying attention to open time, you can see the problems are plain as day.
And to make it worse, they are hidden. I can get a call from them asking to cover a trip. I look on open time, see the trip. Then at departure time when it still isn’t covered, it is either delayed further, or magically coded as a maintenance or weather cancelation. Weird huh?
Old 11-29-2017 | 03:38 AM
  #9427  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Default

Let me offer an analogy.
Let’s say I am working a 9-5 job and you are my boss.
On my way to work one morning I get a flat tire. Could be a quick tire change and be back on the road and get to work on time. However, I don’t carry a spare tire. So now I call you and tell you I can’t make it to work because I have a flat tire.
Was the problem really that I had a flat tire or that I don’t have a spare?
The company might code this as a flat tire issue. I would code this as a spare tire issue.
Old 11-29-2017 | 05:40 AM
  #9428  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,895
Likes: 690
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
OK, let me rephrase this. Where is the proof that these numbers are being directly impacted by crew issues.
You can take my word for it. Staffing is SKW's biggest detriment to performance right now, PBS is giving out 100-hour lines and they still have minimal to no reserves in many places.

Do they have a long-term plan? But I sure hope they're being realistic about the fact that major hiring is just starting to warm up (and the military is going to have to stop their own bleeding soon...)

If they think their current MO is sustainable with additional big airplane orders and additional big major hiring, they're in for a big surprise.
Old 11-29-2017 | 05:48 AM
  #9429  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,895
Likes: 690
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight
Let me offer an analogy.
Let’s say I am working a 9-5 job and you are my boss.
On my way to work one morning I get a flat tire. Could be a quick tire change and be back on the road and get to work on time. However, I don’t carry a spare tire. So now I call you and tell you I can’t make it to work because I have a flat tire.
Was the problem really that I had a flat tire or that I don’t have a spare?
The company might code this as a flat tire issue. I would code this as a spare tire issue.
The real question is how tolerant is the boss?

Right now the majors do not have to include the (pizz poor) operational performance of their regionals in their own on-time and completion numbers. So they are likely willing to cut the regionals some slack, because the alternative is to pay them more.

SKW for example will routinely "delay" a flight up to 24 hours or even more, flying it empty when they can finally find a crew just to avoid a cancellation on the board. Majors let them do it...

But that's changing in a couple years, the law is already passed, so majors will own the operational performance of their regionals, and have to report it as their own.
Old 11-29-2017 | 05:54 AM
  #9430  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
From: Downward Dog
Default

While we were understaffed worse in 2014, the remedy in 2018 wont be as easy as before.

Here comes a pay deal.

They are needing to pay up for dispatchers and mechanics too. Things in the regional world could get unstable very quickly.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices