Spirit of NKS
#2462
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Now with this award, do we have to confront the Company with the transition conflicts individually or is our MEC going to tally the conflicts and propose the company a back compensation for the past violations.
And moving forward, what do we want?, if there is a offer from NK to keep the old ways of transition by getting something we WANT.
OR
Enforce the NEW transition and let them do what they want and we keep grieving stuff until a Judge actually penalizes NK with money.
And moving forward, what do we want?, if there is a offer from NK to keep the old ways of transition by getting something we WANT.
OR
Enforce the NEW transition and let them do what they want and we keep grieving stuff until a Judge actually penalizes NK with money.
#2463
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Now with this award, do we have to confront the Company with the transition conflicts individually or is our MEC going to tally the conflicts and propose the company a back compensation for the past violations.
And moving forward, what do we want?, if there is a offer from NK to keep the old ways of transition by getting something we WANT.
OR
Enforce the NEW transition and let them do what they want and we keep grieving stuff until a Judge actually penalizes NK with money.
And moving forward, what do we want?, if there is a offer from NK to keep the old ways of transition by getting something we WANT.
OR
Enforce the NEW transition and let them do what they want and we keep grieving stuff until a Judge actually penalizes NK with money.
I would suggest that a lump sum settlement be distributed to all pilots regardless of seat or seniority. Or maybe the Captains should just give it all to the FO's, after all, that's essentially what we did with our signing bonus, right?
#2465
Better yet, who gets to decide? I'm sure the company would love to make ALPA prove every case, thus stretching out the process 'til doomsday. I still have two NCC's outstanding from the BUSH 41 administration.
#2466
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
I see Spirit didn't file with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (RITA | Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)). Are they hiding some losses?
#2467
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
I see Spirit didn't file with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (RITA | Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)). Are they hiding some losses?
Bubi, I think they are in there, I found some of the 2010 numbers.
http://www.transtats.bts.gov/Oneway....Percent_Flag=0
I think!
#2468
I see Spirit didn't file with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (RITA | Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)). Are they hiding some losses?
#2469
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
I was told we made money in January and February. I hope it's true.
#2470
It stands to reason that Spirit will "post" a profit given their quest to go public; however, there's a big difference between positive net income and positive free cash flow. The free cash flow metric is what we should be concerned with. Net income is too easy to manipulate.
Spirit is still a private company and can use different accounting methods to show "profits." It's apples versus oranges comparing NK to other publicly held airlines.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



