Search

Notices

Reserve for Dummies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2025 | 07:21 PM
  #2901  
Viper25's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Speak for yourself myself and many others in my base do everything we can to avoid ATL. I come to work with an expectation to fly the trip as it was built that's why I bid it. I understand that things change and as a result so may the trip but I can speak of only one time that a current contract reroute was worth it and that was because it turned a 5 day into a 3 day. This attitude that everything is about making extra money is pervavsive in the industry but way worse at Delta. If you cant make it on the current rates one is doing it wrong but that's on them. This weekend was another reminder of just how awful it could be dealing with irops and reroutes but to each their own I suppose I should be overjoyed about the extra pay :/
THIS IS EXACTLY THE REASON THEY NEGOTIATED RR PAY IN C19.

Too many people were being rerouted that wanted the trips they bid. RR pay is built to disincentivize that. It was done FOR the pilots to keep their rotations as is. Say it with me: RR Pay did not previously exist the way it does today. This RR pay is a good thing. It’s the company’s fault for not paying it properly, NOT the fault of the terms that were agreed to in the contract.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 07:31 PM
  #2902  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,355
Likes: 841
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Speak for yourself myself and many others in my base do everything we can to avoid ATL. I come to work with an expectation to fly the trip as it was built that's why I bid it. I understand that things change and as a result so may the trip but I can speak of only one time that a current contract reroute was worth it and that was because it turned a 5 day into a 3 day. This attitude that everything is about making extra money is pervavsive in the industry but way worse at Delta. If you cant make it on the current rates one is doing it wrong but that's on them. This weekend was another reminder of just how awful it could be dealing with irops and reroutes but to each their own I suppose I should be overjoyed about the extra pay :/
It's about making people abide by thier agreements. The pay is the consolation prize. If things go sideways you are compensated for adapting to the change. It's not about rates either, it's about earnings efficiency. If I make 125 hours one month via GS with 4 extra work days, then the next month can be 8 less work days and 50 hours for the same 2 month pay and net 4 less days worked. Monthly measurements have no meaning. Earn when efficiency is high and take time off when efficiency is low. The net will be more days off OR more money per work completed.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 07:54 PM
  #2903  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Viper25
THIS IS EXACTLY THE REASON THEY NEGOTIATED RR PAY IN C19.

Too many people were being rerouted that wanted the trips they bid. RR pay is built to disincentivize that. It was done FOR the pilots to keep their rotations as is. Say it with me: RR Pay did not previously exist the way it does today. This RR pay is a good thing. It’s the company’s fault for not paying it properly, NOT the fault of the terms that were agreed to in the contract.
I never said it wasn’t a good thing, please point out where I did. I merely said the language is way more complicated than it needs to be and results in many pilots confused as to how much they should be paid. I gave an example on how easy it could be granted I threw out a very generous generic one but I’ll break it down for one that could pretty easily pass. Any schedule change results in the entire rotation paying 150% if you get rerouted a second time it’s 200%. If the reroute is simply taking a 4 day and turning it into 3 or less you get paid the rotation credit as a guarantee. Some of that is pretty similar to what Southwest has. Instead we’ve got dozens of paragraphs and examples of you get pay no credit and a whole litany of other BS that shows up on different lines of a time card, but I already know what you or others will say the company would never agree blah blah blah. I’ve heard this for a decade plus it’s nothing new. Instead it just ends up being a whole lot more work for both sides to figure it out to the minute what someone is owed.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 07:56 PM
  #2904  
20Fathoms's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 173
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Would be great if all that were true but it’s not. Now that trip just got broken up and given to reserves. The days of massive amounts of GS/PB days are long gone now that we’re staffed appropriately. It’s not about being lazy but thanks for the dig against us “lazy” types.
I guess it depends on what you consider “many pilots” but the part you bolded is absolutely true for some pilots. Personally I had 2 assignments in 2024 that got removed due to improper notification and ended up just staying at home with my family rather than spending 10 hours in Syracuse.

At least one of those two went out as a last minute GS so that pilot benefited as well. If you’re going to talk about giving away such a massive thing, there better be a massive quid for us. I’m opposed to any changes in CNO but will officially pick up the pitch fork if we give it away for nothing like we did with batch sizes.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 08:00 PM
  #2905  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
It's about making people abide by thier agreements. The pay is the consolation prize. If things go sideways you are compensated for adapting to the change. It's not about rates either, it's about earnings efficiency. If I make 125 hours one month via GS with 4 extra work days, then the next month can be 8 less work days and 50 hours for the same 2 month pay and net 4 less days worked. Monthly measurements have no meaning. Earn when efficiency is high and take time off when efficiency is low. The net will be more days off OR more money per work completed.
What fleet are you on? A four day slip on mine getting you to 125 means you’re holding a line and one of the highest ones is like 80 hours and 14 days off so now I gotta go down to essentially 10 days off. But then if I wana take it easy the following month I’d bid a min credit line and get 18 off for 65 your math isn’t adding up. Nevermind the fact that I haven’t seen many if any 4 day GS go out in a hot minute.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 08:05 PM
  #2906  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
I guess it depends on what you consider “many pilots” but the part you bolded is absolutely true for some pilots. Personally I had 2 assignments in 2024 that got removed due to improper notification and ended up just staying at home with my family rather than spending 10 hours in Syracuse.

At least one of those two went out as a last minute GS so that pilot benefited as well. If you’re going to talk about giving away such a massive thing, there better be a massive quid for us. I’m opposed to any changes in CNO but will officially pick up the pitch fork if we give it away for nothing like we did with batch sizes.
Again I never said give anything up, the AA system has an option to either be notified by a phone call or app message much like Arcos. I’ve had this happen recently where I never even had the call come through with my carrier and I just see a vm to text, I’ve called and they’ve got no answer as to why that happens. Could be a delta thing or not, my point is people are getting way wrapped around the axel about needing it to be some live scheduler. The company in Ed’s own words is moving towards AI, it creates ton of efficiencies much like our smart phones. Not having to deal with scheduling or tracking is a huge time saver but some folks here would rather waste away on it to make money here and there. Maybe we should should go back paper jepp charts and briefcases. Hell why not go back to paper bidding I miss that a whole bunch. Cue the 6 pack crowd too.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 08:11 PM
  #2907  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Again I never said give anything up, the AA system has an option to either be notified by a phone call or app message much like Arcos. I’ve had this happen recently where I never even had the call come through with my carrier and I just see a vm to text, I’ve called and they’ve got no answer as to why that happens. Could be a delta thing or not, my point is people are getting way wrapped around the axel about needing it to be some live scheduler. The company in Ed’s own words is moving towards AI, it creates ton of efficiencies much like our smart phones. Not having to deal with scheduling or tracking is a huge time saver but some folks here would rather waste away on it to make money here and there. Maybe we should should go back paper jepp charts and briefcases. Hell why not go back to paper bidding I miss that a whole bunch. Cue the 6 pack crowd too.
Why are you willing to gut a huge part of our contract at the same time as you believe that reroutes aren’t paid enough?
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 08:20 PM
  #2908  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
I guess it depends on what you consider “many pilots” but the part you bolded is absolutely true for some pilots. Personally I had 2 assignments in 2024 that got removed due to improper notification and ended up just staying at home with my family rather than spending 10 hours in Syracuse.

At least one of those two went out as a last minute GS so that pilot benefited as well.
Since this is a reserve thread let’s really examine what happened. In a perfect world that example you gave happened. Schedulings new goal now with all of those SC’s is alleviating this ten fold. More often than not it’s getting covered by the plethora of people sitting SC which under the old contract rarely happened. That whole law of unintended consequences… your example very well coulda caused the crappy four days I got hammered with last month where I got a SC conversion and then subsequent two day and then was put on SC following that trip and had to go fly a crappy turn which likely came from some other broken up trip. I signed up for this job and I’m not complaining that I have to work my entire point in all of this is that there could be many ways to work around this that makes life easier for all but I get it as humans we tend to look out for numero uno and only see life through our own lens. People PCS all the time and have no issues with whatever those calls are called VRU or whatever but in the handful of other times it’s a non starter which I get cause hey it’s in the contract but talk about wanting their cake and eating it too.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 08:24 PM
  #2909  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
Why are you willing to gut a huge part of our contract at the same time as you believe that reroutes aren’t paid enough?
Nothing is being gutted and your opinion of huge is disingenuous. You know what’s a huge loss? Putting almost every reserve pilot onto SC and almost overnight eliminating GS outside of a massive irop.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 08:57 PM
  #2910  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,355
Likes: 841
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Nothing is being gutted and your opinion of huge is disingenuous. You know what’s a huge loss? Putting almost every reserve pilot onto SC and almost overnight eliminating GS outside of a massive irop.
That's not a huge loss that's proper staffing, a huge gain. That wasn't a conscious decision by management either, just a confluence of factors like massive hiring followed by stiffled aircraft deliveries. And if the rumors are true (I still doubt biggly) we are cutting hiring to fix that and will inevitably overshoot. That and pilots holding thier ground with notification and contactability after the experiences of last weekend will result in the GS-fest returning sooner than you think. If instead it all works out fine it'll be by coincidence only and you will be happy. No reroutes and reserves get an extra 6 hours for sitting around. What kind of odds will you take on a bet things get a little hot?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BestForward
JetBlue
14679
Today 12:58 AM
Heavyflyer
FedEx
21
04-11-2021 09:13 AM
GoJet Recruiter
GoJet
165
05-21-2018 10:51 AM
Flytolive
United
714
01-12-2016 03:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices