Search

Notices

Reserve for Dummies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2025 | 09:18 PM
  #2911  
20Fathoms's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 169
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Since this is a reserve thread let’s really examine what happened. In a perfect world that example you gave happened. Schedulings new goal now with all of those SC’s is alleviating this ten fold. More often than not it’s getting covered by the plethora of people sitting SC which under the old contract rarely happened. That whole law of unintended consequences… your example very well coulda caused the crappy four days I got hammered with last month where I got a SC conversion and then subsequent two day and then was put on SC following that trip and had to go fly a crappy turn which likely came from some other broken up trip. I signed up for this job and I’m not complaining that I have to work my entire point in all of this is that there could be many ways to work around this that makes life easier for all but I get it as humans we tend to look out for numero uno and only see life through our own lens. People PCS all the time and have no issues with whatever those calls are called VRU or whatever but in the handful of other times it’s a non starter which I get cause hey it’s in the contract but talk about wanting their cake and eating it too.
Do tell, what are these ways? Do they involve letting CNO be notification for trips? If so the quid would have to be huge to make up for the 8 extra days off I had last year.

BTW I hate the SC carpet bombing too, but that’s more of an attempt to reduce the PB days the company despises so much (I used 5 in December along with 5 vacation days to get the whole month off). If you want to put more restrictions on SC I’m 100 percent on board with that.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 10:16 PM
  #2912  
Viper25's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 322
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
I never said it wasn’t a good thing, please point out where I did. I merely said the language is way more complicated than it needs to be and results in many pilots confused as to how much they should be paid. I gave an example on how easy it could be granted I threw out a very generous generic one but I’ll break it down for one that could pretty easily pass. Any schedule change results in the entire rotation paying 150% if you get rerouted a second time it’s 200%. If the reroute is simply taking a 4 day and turning it into 3 or less you get paid the rotation credit as a guarantee. Some of that is pretty similar to what Southwest has. Instead we’ve got dozens of paragraphs and examples of you get pay no credit and a whole litany of other BS that shows up on different lines of a time card, but I already know what you or others will say the company would never agree blah blah blah. I’ve heard this for a decade plus it’s nothing new. Instead it just ends up being a whole lot more work for both sides to figure it out to the minute what someone is owed.
Again, the fact that it’s multiple lines on the time card, or has to be combined from different sources, is due to the company’s implementation and interface. RR pay could very well be on a single line, and/or in a single source showing the pay by the leg, but the company doesn’t care to invest in the most basic of IT. That does *not* mean that a lousy provision (and lousy language) was negotiated.
Reply
Old 01-14-2025 | 11:03 PM
  #2913  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
So you’re in favor of the current setup where it takes multiple people cross checking your calculations to arrive at what you should be paid? I mean seriously this isn’t that hard but I understand this is Delta we need a form for a friggin form.
is that what I said I’m in favor of? if not, why did you respond like this?
Reply
Old 01-15-2025 | 02:50 AM
  #2914  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,490
Likes: 482
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Not having to deal with scheduling or tracking is a huge time saver but some folks here would rather waste away on it to make money here and there.

You know what else is a huge time saver, getting to stay home because they didn't properly assign rest. Takes way less time/effort than even a day turn.


Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Nothing is being gutted and your opinion of huge is disingenuous. You know what’s a huge loss? Putting almost every reserve pilot onto SC and almost overnight eliminating GS outside of a massive irop.

The massive amount of SC is more likely a result of 18 hour callout. I bet we would get fewer SC if we went back to 12 hour callouts, I'm down, let's make it happen. I'm guessing some on here are going to disagree.
Reply
Old 01-15-2025 | 03:33 AM
  #2915  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,532
Likes: 1,129
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
I never said it wasn’t a good thing, please point out where I did. I merely said the language is way more complicated than it needs to be and results in many pilots confused as to how much they should be paid. I gave an example on how easy it could be granted I threw out a very generous generic one but I’ll break it down for one that could pretty easily pass. Any schedule change results in the entire rotation paying 150% if you get rerouted a second time it’s 200%. If the reroute is simply taking a 4 day and turning it into 3 or less you get paid the rotation credit as a guarantee. Some of that is pretty similar to what Southwest has. Instead we’ve got dozens of paragraphs and examples of you get pay no credit and a whole litany of other BS that shows up on different lines of a time card, but I already know what you or others will say the company would never agree blah blah blah. I’ve heard this for a decade plus it’s nothing new. Instead it just ends up being a whole lot more work for both sides to figure it out to the minute what someone is owed.
Our reroute pay is not that complicated. 150% for what you fly the day of the reroute and 200% for every day after until you are returned to your rotation. If they never return you to your rotation, the entire remaining credit is paid at 150 or 200%.

I just want to point out that your example is a concession. Why are you suggesting a concession?
Reply
Old 01-15-2025 | 04:00 AM
  #2916  
Jughead135's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 2
From: Hates Commuting
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
The massive amount of SC is more likely a result of 18 hour callout. I bet we would get fewer SC if we went back to 12 hour callouts, I'm down, let's make it happen. I'm guessing some on here are going to disagree.
Only if we also go back to next-day coverage.
Reply
Old 01-15-2025 | 04:03 AM
  #2917  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,490
Likes: 482
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead135
Only if we also go back to next-day coverage.

This as well.
Reply
Old 01-15-2025 | 04:49 AM
  #2918  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 200
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Our reroute pay is not that complicated. 150% for what you fly the day of the reroute and 200% for every day after until you are returned to your rotation. If they never return you to your rotation, the entire remaining credit is paid at 150 or 200%.

I just want to point out that your example is a concession. Why are you suggesting a concession?
They are suggesting a concession because they don’t like it and it’s just to complicated for him.

Those of us that have literally made tens of thousands of $$$ on the new reroute rules and had many more days off because of the need for be properly notified understand that it is a big concession. Especially remembering working under the rules under old contracts.

It may be more complicated than you want but learn the rules and hold the line when something isn’t right. THATS how you change things, not negotiate into compliance (cough scope cough).

Edit: that does not even count EDP and sit pays too.
Reply
Old 01-15-2025 | 05:02 AM
  #2919  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,490
Likes: 482
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
They are suggesting a concession because they don’t like it and it’s just to complicated for him.

Those of us that have literally made tens of thousands of $$$ on the new reroute rules and had many more days off because of the need for be properly notified understand that it is a big concession. Especially remembering working under the rules under old contracts.

It may be more complicated than you want but learn the rules and hold the line when something isn’t right. THATS how you change things, not negotiate into compliance (cough scope cough).

Edit: that does not even count EDP and sit pays too.

This! Our reroute pay is light years ahead of what we had before. Before I usually just assumed I wouldn't get anything, because most of time we didn't, or it was so small that I didn't care. I certainly didn't have any idea how to calculate it. With the new rules, not only have a made a bunch of extra, most of the trips, I can easily calculate it and it's generally been paid out correctly. The one exception was a 2 day that got royally jacked up that involved an illegal reroute. I think I have calculated it correctly and it's going to pay me more than the original trip itself. That's before I count the assignment pay. For this case, I just throw it to the pros and they get me paid. Under the old contract, I'd have gotten pennies.
Reply
Old 01-15-2025 | 05:55 AM
  #2920  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 1,200
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
The massive amount of SC is more likely a result of 18 hour callout. I bet we would get fewer SC if we went back to 12 hour callouts, I'm down, let's make it happen. I'm guessing some on here are going to disagree.
Perhaps with massively increased contractual limits on SC assignments, along with a return to next day coverage as Jughead suggested.

The maximization of SC is a direct result of BS, RG and others working to squeeze every cent of value out of the PWA, particularly section 23. It’s a permanent paradigm shift. They won’t ever voluntarily return to the previous average of 2-3 SCs per month, even with a reduction in LC time.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BestForward
JetBlue
14674
05-15-2026 05:50 PM
Heavyflyer
FedEx
21
04-11-2021 09:13 AM
GoJet Recruiter
GoJet
165
05-21-2018 10:51 AM
Flytolive
United
714
01-12-2016 03:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices