Reserve for Dummies
02-08-2025 | 05:35 AM
#3171
Banned
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
As the negotiators said after the current contract TA came out: “Pay, no credit” is the “phrase that pays”. Anytime the “credit” column on the time card is blank, that pay is on top of/above Reaerve Guarantee.
Widgetcrew.com is an awesome website to bookmark. Copy your iCrew time card, and paste it into that website, and it does all the math for you.
Also, “H & M” is a calculator app that allows you to add/subtract and multiply hours and minutes. A worthwhile download.
Widgetcrew.com is an awesome website to bookmark. Copy your iCrew time card, and paste it into that website, and it does all the math for you.
Also, “H & M” is a calculator app that allows you to add/subtract and multiply hours and minutes. A worthwhile download.
02-08-2025 | 05:40 PM
#3172
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 925
Likes: 82
From: B737 FO
I finally got a response to my pay inquiry on SCs above 6 and they not surprisingly denied it based on PWA 23.S.3.a and claim "you may be awarded but not will be awarded" and "it comes at company discretion". Funny how they didn't mention 23.S.1.f. I know it's useless to continue arguing with them and I already filed an STS but man is it frustrating!
02-08-2025 | 06:43 PM
#3173
On Reserve
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 153
Likes: 21
Why is CNO okay here? I thought CS had to contact you to notify you of SC, meaning CNO doesn't count?
02-08-2025 | 10:24 PM
#3174
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 174
The PWA difference is “attempted contact” vs “notification” I believe.
02-09-2025 | 03:33 AM
#3175
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by FangsF15;3880808.
[url=http://Widgetcrew.com
[url=http://Widgetcrew.com
Widgetcrew.com[/url] is an awesome website to bookmark. Copy your iCrew time card, and paste it into that website, and it does all the math for you.
02-09-2025 | 04:44 AM
#3176
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 527
Likes: 26
From: 320
I finally got a response to my pay inquiry on SCs above 6 and they not surprisingly denied it based on PWA 23.S.3.a and claim "you may be awarded but not will be awarded" and "it comes at company discretion". Funny how they didn't mention 23.S.1.f. I know it's useless to continue arguing with them and I already filed an STS but man is it frustrating!
02-09-2025 | 04:53 AM
#3177
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
These Crew Assist inquiry cases appear to be essentially worthless when pointing out when something was done or assigned in error. You can tell by the response that the person handling your case has essentially no clue about the subject matter your inquiring about. The response I got from mine just now is laughable. It's like they might not have even read what I submitted. I love the "have a nice day thanks" sign off. Can we go right to an STS or do we have to start at the crew assist level?
the knowledge they have of the PWA is based on their supervisor’s interpretations and in cases where it differs from ALPA it’s more than likely been mentioned to the higher ups but good luck getting them to disseminate this. Part 2, these answers to the pilots come from the same pool of folks that respond to the ALPA committee tasked with disputing via STS.
02-09-2025 | 04:55 AM
#3178
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 18
02-09-2025 | 04:58 AM
#3179
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 18
I don’t mean to rain on your parade of thinking the Crew Assist folks don’t know but here it goes:
the knowledge they have of the PWA is based on their supervisor’s interpretations and in cases where it differs from ALPA it’s more than likely been mentioned to the higher ups but good luck getting them to disseminate this. Part 2, these answers to the pilots come from the same pool of folks that respond to the ALPA committee tasked with disputing via STS.
the knowledge they have of the PWA is based on their supervisor’s interpretations and in cases where it differs from ALPA it’s more than likely been mentioned to the higher ups but good luck getting them to disseminate this. Part 2, these answers to the pilots come from the same pool of folks that respond to the ALPA committee tasked with disputing via STS.
02-09-2025 | 05:30 AM
#3180
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 527
Likes: 26
From: 320
I don’t mean to rain on your parade of thinking the Crew Assist folks don’t know but here it goes:
the knowledge they have of the PWA is based on their supervisor’s interpretations and in cases where it differs from ALPA it’s more than likely been mentioned to the higher ups but good luck getting them to disseminate this. Part 2, these answers to the pilots come from the same pool of folks that respond to the ALPA committee tasked with disputing via STS.
the knowledge they have of the PWA is based on their supervisor’s interpretations and in cases where it differs from ALPA it’s more than likely been mentioned to the higher ups but good luck getting them to disseminate this. Part 2, these answers to the pilots come from the same pool of folks that respond to the ALPA committee tasked with disputing via STS.
Yea I dropped them both in at the same time, just didn't know if a c-assist inquiry had to come back denied for it to be able to move up the food chain.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
