Reserve for Dummies
#3071
Are the 'legalities' in the middle of my post correct?
#3072
Wondering if CS has tried something like this:
Scenario: RRRR/X/RRRR, no 30-hr before X-day (or no contractual notification) as previously discussed. Pilot ascertains (however they choose) that they have a 1200-2100 SC placed on the first Res day of second block w/leading 18hr rest block showing in MiCrew (no notification-not required, nothing acknowledged-not required).
First let's make sure I've got what is legal.
Legal to start RAP, legal to accept a FDP as long as it starts before 1800 (into 30-hr rest), legal to DH after 1800 (into 30-hr rest).
Pilot: I can accept the first flight but I need a 30-hr rest before anything else.
CS: You just came off a rest of more than 30 hours. Your 24 hour X-day plus the 12 hours that you knew about from your schedule check.
Pilot: No, I had a 24 hour X-day, prospective rest. I woke up at 0001 and ascertained that I had a legal 10-hour prospective rest before a RAP so was legal-to-accept the assignment. Not the same. Not legal without 30-hours.
Scenario: RRRR/X/RRRR, no 30-hr before X-day (or no contractual notification) as previously discussed. Pilot ascertains (however they choose) that they have a 1200-2100 SC placed on the first Res day of second block w/leading 18hr rest block showing in MiCrew (no notification-not required, nothing acknowledged-not required).
First let's make sure I've got what is legal.
Legal to start RAP, legal to accept a FDP as long as it starts before 1800 (into 30-hr rest), legal to DH after 1800 (into 30-hr rest).
Pilot: I can accept the first flight but I need a 30-hr rest before anything else.
CS: You just came off a rest of more than 30 hours. Your 24 hour X-day plus the 12 hours that you knew about from your schedule check.
Pilot: No, I had a 24 hour X-day, prospective rest. I woke up at 0001 and ascertained that I had a legal 10-hour prospective rest before a RAP so was legal-to-accept the assignment. Not the same. Not legal without 30-hours.
I would be interested to hear what an actual ALPA 117 Rep says
#3073
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 385
ALPA stance (as stated numeroud times by outed Sched Chair SK on the widget sched page) is that legal to start RAP, legal to finish. So in your scenario, you could except a FDP (non DH only) between 1800-2100 of the SC).
I would be interested to hear what an actual ALPA 117 Rep says
I would be interested to hear what an actual ALPA 117 Rep says
Quotes from FAR 117:
FAR 117.3 Definitions
Reserve availability period (RAP) means a duty period during which a certificate holder requires a flightcrew member on short call reserve to be available to receive an assignment for a flight duty period
Flight duty period (FDP) means a period that begins when a flightcrew member is required to report for duty with the intention of conducting a flight...
FAR 117.25 Rest Period
(b) Before beginning any reserve or flight duty period a flightcrew member must be given at least 30 consecutive hours free from all duty within the past 168 consecutive hour period.
To me, the "OR" in 117.25 is critical. As in, the same sentence can be read through as a result of the "OR", as in:
Before beginning any reserve period a flightcrew member must be given at least 30 consecutive hours free from all duty within the past 168 consecutive hour period.
Before beginning any flight duty period a flightcrew member must be given at least 30 consecutive hours free from all duty within the past 168 consecutive hour period.
To me, they are seperate unique requirements, and being legal for one does not make one legal for the other. ALPA please?
Last edited by Verdell; 01-26-2025 at 04:02 PM.
#3074
This is why I differentiated between what I could accept before and after 1800: the "OR". I could defend legal to start (and complete) a RAP, and legal to start (and complete) a FDP that REPORTS prior to 1800, but not after.
After 1800 I cannot look back 168 hours and see a 30-hour prospective rest period, thus I don't believe I'm legal to start a FDP (even out of a RAP) after 1800.
Since a DH-only duty period has been determined to NOT be a FDP, and that means that I could accept that right up to the end of the RAP.
Again, an ALPA 117 guru, please chime in.
#3075
I sent DART to DALPA FTDT and this is their response.
“Great quesiton! The inteprretation is that if a pilot is legal to start a RAP then they are also legal for an FDP that reports within that RAP - even if the FDP report time would otherwise not have the 30/168 lookback.”
“Great quesiton! The inteprretation is that if a pilot is legal to start a RAP then they are also legal for an FDP that reports within that RAP - even if the FDP report time would otherwise not have the 30/168 lookback.”
#3076
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,502
Likes: 496
I sent DART to DALPA FTDT and this is their response.
“Great quesiton! The inteprretation is that if a pilot is legal to start a RAP then they are also legal for an FDP that reports within that RAP - even if the FDP report time would otherwise not have the 30/168 lookback.”
“Great quesiton! The inteprretation is that if a pilot is legal to start a RAP then they are also legal for an FDP that reports within that RAP - even if the FDP report time would otherwise not have the 30/168 lookback.”
Lol wut, is this serious? Is that an interpretation from someone in the FAA, or otherwise in a capacity that carries the same weight?
#3077
And the interpretation matches what ex Sched Chair SK has stated on the widget scheduling page numerous times.
My understanding is the interpretation changed a few years back to where a FDP that reports within the RAP is considered part of the RAP, therefore legal to start, legal to finish.
#3078
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
It’s from Delta ALPA FTDT committee…the people we pay dues to be the SME on 117 issues.
And the interpretation matches what ex Sched Chair SK has stated on the widget scheduling page numerous times.
My understanding is the interpretation changed a few years back to where a FDP that reports within the RAP is considered part of the RAP, therefore legal to start, legal to finish.
And the interpretation matches what ex Sched Chair SK has stated on the widget scheduling page numerous times.
My understanding is the interpretation changed a few years back to where a FDP that reports within the RAP is considered part of the RAP, therefore legal to start, legal to finish.
#3079
#3080
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 385
I sent DART to DALPA FTDT and this is their response.
“Great quesiton! The inteprretation is that if a pilot is legal to start a RAP then they are also legal for an FDP that reports within that RAP - even if the FDP report time would otherwise not have the 30/168 lookback.”
“Great quesiton! The inteprretation is that if a pilot is legal to start a RAP then they are also legal for an FDP that reports within that RAP - even if the FDP report time would otherwise not have the 30/168 lookback.”
"It’s entirely legal for you to be a long call pilot for greater than seven consecutive days; however, you cannot legally begin a RAP or report for an FDP without first receiving an additional 30 hours of rest."
Again... OR report for an FDP. Can't Start a RAP, can't report for an FDP, without 30 in 168. Would love to see another scheduling alert that clarifies this.
EDIT: I'll throw in another reference that seems even more un-ambiguous:
SRH Pg 147
"Rest Required Prior to Reserve
-30 consecutive hours of rest (free of duty) in the 168 hours immediately preceding the start of ANY FDP, RAP, or airport standby reserve"
Last edited by Verdell; 01-27-2025 at 06:43 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





