Do you not see the word CREW on his badge and him holding a set of FO wings? If it flys like a duck...

 

Here's the blurb with the pic. So they are all pilots:

Endeavor Air Please join us in congratulating our last class of ground school graduates for 2017 - 31 amazing aviators have earned their wings! Endeavor Air hired 625 pilots throughout the year, with another 70+ ready to kick off 2018. It's an excellent time to #EarnMoreNow and say #IFlyEDV!

 

I don't see anything wrong besides the tattoo, which can obviously be covered up. Otherwise he wouldn't have been hired. His hair looks fine. Has has a nice button-down shirt and better pants than the management person standing 2 feet away. And are you seriously making fun of his lanyard? I hope you are this vocal to everyone who has their favorite sports team advertised around their neck. Somehow I doubt it.

Pretty weak to pick out someone and attack them anonymously on the internet. I hope we can move on from this quickly.

 

I take it back about the mixed class. Anyway, old stiffley stiffersons airing out their grievances about stylish haircuts is as much part of the job as deicing and flow into LGA. Take it from someone who had hair down to his mid back for the first half of his flying career and now looks like a news caster.

 

Rough crowd. Jeez.
Judge a person on their character.

 

This place is falling apart. Pilots with sleeves and others who can/can’t/should/shouldn’t fly a plane with or without a flight director. I don’t know how we all are surviving...

Follow the book, but keep your skills sharp when allowed. And for the love of synergy, question the captain of it’s a matter of safety or the book, but if they ask you to not do something and have a valid concern listen to them. PIC still means something even in a CRM environment. You may be an (regional) airline pilot, but the captain is still signing for the flight. Unfortunately, not every FO is as good as others and it’s hard to get a good gauge of where someone is until you’re with them for a bit.

 

But, but, the book says I can do it so what’s the problem captain? (Sarcasm) I’ve never understood guys that just try to swim upstream and go against everything the captain says. I never seen it happen until I was on a AA jumpseat last week and the FO had a different suggestion every time the captain asked him to do something. I don’t mean to come off as nonchalant but if you want me to do something I will as long as it won’t get me violated or killed. As long as it gets done idc. It’s crazy to hear guys getting upset because they can’t do something they way they want to.

 

Show me a CA with an ID outside of the 90,000's who actually flys SOP to the letter and i'll eat my shoes. The amount of mixing of Pincolsaba procedures with REV 3 is stupid. I can count on one hand the CA's that can even do the damn runway position, departure, first fix + HAA briefing correctly. I don't care if you like or don't like the scripted briefings. Company says do it this way then we do it that way.

Let the SOP argument end here. If you aren't flying by the book then you open yourself up to trouble. Right or wrong if the book said cut thrust levers to idle at 100ft AGL no one could fault you if doing so resulted in aircraft damage because you were following SOP.


Now, if what the CA is doing won't get me killed or violated then I am inclined not to care. My job description does not say SOP COP.

 

Well, it kind of does. The 2 pilots are a crew, and if one isn't following SOP then the crew isn't following SOP. By joining a crew, we buy in to responsibility for the other member. Obviously more so for the CA, but it goes both ways.

Now I get it, you've gotta pick your battles because you can't bog down the whole fight in minutiae like the order of the HAA briefing.

But every time I hear something like "won't get me killed," it immediately makes me think that the speaker's threshold of acceptability is too low. After all the whole purpose of SOP's is to avoid getting killed to begin with, and it's not up to us to determine that a SOP is too conservative and ignore it. They're supposed to be more conservative than the bare threshold of safety and allow a margin.

Everybody ever who got themselves killed due to SOP non-compliance of course didn't think they were gonna get themselves killed, and that the SOP in question was inconsequential queep. Therefore there's a mismatch between their evaluation of the necessity of that SOP, and the reality.

How do we know we're not making the same mistake?

 

Agree 120%..HOWEVER..The 10,000' chime now being predicated on AFE and not MSL is ridiculous