Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
How long for a contract? >

How long for a contract?


Notices

How long for a contract?

Old 03-16-2026 | 07:48 PM
  #2451  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 22
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by I like BIG Bus
No LOA’s during section 6!

Why is the union on a road show trying to sell a training LOA that only truly benefits the company during contract negotiations?? I could care less about the rinky dink, paltry items they want to trade away a large leverage point we have in this negotiation for. You have to ask yourself why the company wants and or needs this. The savings they put out don’t tell the whole story. Sure I would like to have AQP, but not at the cost of allowing them to have even less incentive to get the contract done. AQP may save them what they said just in “training” costs, but being able to train in MCO saves them a ton more. We already have that coming in the new contract, allowing them to do that with an LOA gives them those savings without having to secure a new contract. It’s a misdirection play, NO LOA’S PERIOD!!! Until we have a contract. FUPM!
its 3D chess man, chill out. Showing the NMB you are super supportive in cost savings and efficiency is important for getting industry standard rates….

They ain’t going to roll over and give us a 50% pay raise over AQP and MCO training….

but showing the NMB we are the best and most supportive labor group possible and are getting hosed gets us released for self help…
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 08:35 PM
  #2452  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 743
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by OnTilt
its 3D chess man, chill out. Showing the NMB you are super supportive in cost savings and efficiency is important for getting industry standard rates….

They ain’t going to roll over and give us a 50% pay raise over AQP and MCO training….

but showing the NMB we are the best and most supportive labor group possible and are getting hosed gets us released for self help…
That's good in theory, but not reality.

WHY did you guys not get release in 2018 when the company was wildly profitable??
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 11:15 PM
  #2453  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 171
Likes: 29
Default

Originally Posted by OnTilt
its 3D chess man, chill out. Showing the NMB you are super supportive in cost savings and efficiency is important for getting industry standard rates….

They ain’t going to roll over and give us a 50% pay raise over AQP and MCO training….

but showing the NMB we are the best and most supportive labor group possible and are getting hosed gets us released for self help…
I am not sure if this is sarcasm or not. We do need to chose a path and so far that path has been be incredibly accommodating. the farther down that path we go the harder it is to turn back. Remember the NMB is like a marriage counselor. Their customer is the Marriage or in this case the airline. If one side gives up most of the time and the other almost never gives up. What course do you think will get you out of work earlier? We need bargaining chips that don't rely on pity. We have enough and it's not taken us very far.

I don't see F9 putting up the numbers to make it worthwhile. They will throw some low ball numbers out Possibly some of which our union may entertain. I doubt it but maybe. To me this is like eating you foot because your starving, Now your not hungry, but it's much harder to get food in the future.
We are in Negotiations. They don't need to take 15 years. Pay your hand wrong and they will.
Reply
Old 03-17-2026 | 07:38 AM
  #2454  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 452
Likes: 52
Default

No need for a CBA when we are giving away our leverage through LOAs.

San Juan—gone.
Shortened training—gone.
AQP—next.

All in the name of “good faith,” while we remain the lowest paid Airbus pilots in the country.
Reply
Old 03-17-2026 | 08:17 AM
  #2455  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,749
Likes: 55
Default

Originally Posted by Planedrive
No need for a CBA when we are giving away our leverage through LOAs.

San Juan—gone.
Shortened training—gone.
AQP—next.

All in the name of “good faith,” while we remain the lowest paid Airbus pilots in the country.
There was zero leverage with San Juan. That was set for expedited arbitration had no agreement been reached. So loa or arbitration ruling. Either way it’s resolved by now. Carry on.
Reply
Old 03-17-2026 | 09:07 AM
  #2456  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 205
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
There was zero leverage with San Juan. That was set for expedited arbitration had no agreement been reached. So loa or arbitration ruling. Either way it’s resolved by now. Carry on.
Yes there was leverage. Your propeganda is disingenuous. Or you just don't understand how expedited arbitration works.
Your union pals either refused or didn't understand how to negotiate. Effective union represention would have rendered similar outcome to what other airlines get.
Reply
Old 03-17-2026 | 09:16 AM
  #2457  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,749
Likes: 55
Default

Originally Posted by fivebyfive
Yes there was leverage. Your propeganda is disingenuous. Or you just don't understand how expedited arbitration works.
Your union pals either refused or didn't understand how to negotiate. Effective union represention would have rendered similar outcome to what other airlines get.
I’ll buy that. Except the part of I don’t know how arbitrations work. I’ve Been a witness at several f9 arbitrations in the past. Anyhow what do others have that we should have been able to obtain? Again it wouldn’t provide current leverage in sec 6 as it would be resolved already. Key word in your first sentence “was”.

Last edited by fcoolaiddrinker; 03-17-2026 at 09:50 AM.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 03:21 PM
  #2458  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 66
Likes: 7
Default

Going against AQP, a safety focused program, when ALPA is actively fighting to keep two pilots in the flight deck for safety is counterintuitive.

It's happening if we do an LOA or not. Better to participate, than be outside.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 06:06 PM
  #2459  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 75
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Warhawker
Going against AQP, a safety focused program, when ALPA is actively fighting to keep two pilots in the flight deck for safety is counterintuitive.

It's happening if we do an LOA or not. Better to participate, than be outside.
No favors, no waivers. If the company wants something, they can include it in the new contract.
Reply
Old 03-18-2026 | 06:22 PM
  #2460  
Stirring the pot
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 63
From: Off reserve 🤫
Default

Originally Posted by covid19
No favors, no waivers..
need that on a bag tag and lanyard!

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
CAL73CAPT
United
18
01-16-2011 07:46 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices