System bid
#263
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 992
Disagree. The settling of the seniority based on the difference between aircraft will have occurred by the next round of negotiations. Tying the two aircraft together was a mistake they made the first time. They should be tied to industry aircraft of same type/size, not to each other.
#264
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,517
Disagree. The settling of the seniority based on the difference between aircraft will have occurred by the next round of negotiations. Tying the two aircraft together was a mistake they made the first time. They should be tied to industry aircraft of same type/size, not to each other.
Um... so you mean like 717 pay at delta? We should’ve been closer to that! C series pay is pretty lacking going forward too. Good news is by the time we get any of those, in any real quantity, we will be well into negotiations again.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#265
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 992
Um... so you mean like 717 pay at delta? We should’ve been closer to that! C series pay is pretty lacking going forward too. Good news is by the time we get any of those, in any real quantity, we will be well into negotiations again.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#266
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,900
Disagree. The settling of the seniority based on the difference between aircraft will have occurred by the next round of negotiations. Tying the two aircraft together was a mistake they made the first time. They should be tied to industry aircraft of same type/size, not to each other.
If they had, they wouldn't have all these training events!
#267
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 992
And yes we would have. Artificially applying a 90% Bus rate to the 190 wasn’t sustainable. This shift was inevitable. Might be just as big when junior guys jump off the 320/321 and bid the 220 because those rates will be close.
#268
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,517
No doubt when the 220 starts coming online the super junior 80%+ captain probably won’t exist anymore.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#269
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 522
That’s our problem. We need negotiators and ultimately LEC reps willing to stand up for our worth and don’t move on when we ask and they say no next time.
And yes we would have. Artificially applying a 90% Bus rate to the 190 wasn’t sustainable. This shift was inevitable. Might be just as big when junior guys jump off the 320/321 and bid the 220 because those rates will be close.
And yes we would have. Artificially applying a 90% Bus rate to the 190 wasn’t sustainable. This shift was inevitable. Might be just as big when junior guys jump off the 320/321 and bid the 220 because those rates will be close.
#270
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 442
DAL rates going into their current negotiations:
A321: 285.50
B739: 285.50
B738: 284.01
A320: 274.06
A319: 274.06
A223: 269.15
A221: 262.84
B717: 255.57
JB’s E190 rate is pathetic and should be at least JB’s A221 rate. JB’s A221 rate should be the current A223 rate. Dying fleet or new fleet not on property...these rates matter and this should have been a resounding no. The cost of training events will surpass the amount they’d have paid with decent rates.
A321: 285.50
B739: 285.50
B738: 284.01
A320: 274.06
A319: 274.06
A223: 269.15
A221: 262.84
B717: 255.57
JB’s E190 rate is pathetic and should be at least JB’s A221 rate. JB’s A221 rate should be the current A223 rate. Dying fleet or new fleet not on property...these rates matter and this should have been a resounding no. The cost of training events will surpass the amount they’d have paid with decent rates.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post