Notices

Alaska Air Hiring

Old 08-07-2025 | 02:17 PM
  #8481  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,347
Likes: 329
Default

Originally Posted by Jet J
If you don’t know what industry leading looks like I don’t buy it. I’ve told my reps what I want to see, section by section. Matching industry contracts IS mediocre, or sub par. I want the bar raised not matched. Which is what it sounds like our NC is planning on doing based off the podcasts and update teams calls. Not just pay rates not just work rules, everything.

It’s not “buzzwords”, if you want I can pm the novel I sent the union with all my asks. “This company is too cheap”, “ they will never pay us industry leading or give us the best work rules” so sick of hearing this out on line. Hold there feet to the fire vote no on the first ask, if they want any of this done quick they have to make it worth our while. If not I could care less how long this takes.

What is everything?

What’s one thing industry standard that you’d refuse to sign unless it was industry leading, excluding as you said pay?


Are you aware of the differences between a JCBA and full on Section 6 negotiation?
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 02:23 PM
  #8482  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 350
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by Jet J
If you don’t know what industry leading looks like I don’t buy it. I’ve told my reps what I want to see, section by section. Matching industry contracts IS mediocre, or sub par. I want the bar raised not matched. Which is what it sounds like our NC is planning on doing based off the podcasts and update teams calls. Not just pay rates not just work rules, everything.

It’s not “buzzwords”, if you want I can pm the novel I sent the union with all my asks. “This company is too cheap”, “ they will never pay us industry leading or give us the best work rules” so sick of hearing this out on line. Hold there feet to the fire vote no on the first ask, if they want any of this done quick they have to make it worth our while. If not I could care less how long this takes.
Again, industry leading doesnt really mean anything. Do you just want the most of everything? Take what everyone else has, make it bigger and slap a yes vote on it? I have no doubt you have real context to the buzzwords but that is really all they are without the context, and they are even more meaningless when said on APC. You writing the reps is perfect.

I remember hearing that rhetoric too during the last merger. So many AS pilots told me that it is one or the other. I don't believe in that logic. We can have our cake and eat it too 100% and there is no excuse this time, that is for sure. I think the reality is that most of us want the same thing but we also need to think of things that are specific to our new emerging airline once this merger is complete. For example, the red herring is the Amazon flying and we need unique and robust language surrounding that entire operation. To me when I hear industry leading, I hear that we want to boiler plate and add 5% to it and I don't think that does us justice.
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 02:25 PM
  #8483  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 350
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams
Have you read a union email? They show every section as being actively negotiated or an agreement having been made. This isn't the Virgin/Alaska merger where they confined the JCBA to a couple of sections.
Yes I did, and the JCBA is not touching every section of the contract. That is why it is important to make the distinction. Also, to my knowledge, the same sections were negotiated last time for the VX/AS JCBA.
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 03:06 PM
  #8484  
Jet J's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Space Force
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 519
Likes: 87
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest

I remember hearing that rhetoric too during the last merger. So many AS pilots told me that it is one or the other. I don't believe in that logic. We can have our cake and eat it too 100% and there is no excuse this time, that is for sure. I think the reality is that most of us want the same thing but we also need to think of things that are specific to our new emerging airline once this merger is complete..
There was no excuse last time, just like there is no excuse this time, I remember being shocked when it passed by as much as it did.

Dude I don’t even know what you’re arguing. This whole forum is meaningless then. As was already pointed out, it’s subjective, industry leading is different (marginally) for everyone, but not really. It’s the sentiment to not cave in and accept less or equal to what others already have that I’m saying needs to be killed.

Most of us know what we’re worth and what a good contract looks like. We knew the last one was sub par. My lack of pontificating on what a good “industry leading” contract is on this forum doesn’t mean people don’t know what a good one looks like. Nor does it render my point meaningless.
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 03:08 PM
  #8485  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,347
Likes: 329
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
Again with the tired old “if you don’t like it leave.” You’re so desperate to finish up the JCBA so you can fly one of those aurora aircraft. Now you’re projecting it to other pilots career expectations.

It’s almost funny if it weren’t so sad watching you push back on other forum users who realize how bad this merger will be for our careers. Why not share which sections of the contract can be changed instead of arguing with the forum users here saying they want industry leading? Instead of making cryptic references to section 6?

You just want the JCBA to be rushed through so you can get your hands on one of those aircraft hanging by a string in your look at me I’m a pilot room.

Harsh reality is you could get a 10% paycut right now and you still wouldn’t give up your left seat or seniority to start over elsewhere.




Contract gains will reflect whatever the current market/economy conditions dictate. Thats how it’s always been. This isn’t 2022/2023 anymore.



Vote no to your hearts content. I do recall you were against the contract extension and pay increases on Sept 1 this year and next. How would that have gone? While all the other airlines would have gotten their pay raise for 2025 and 2026, you would have been left behind and complaining about it here.
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 03:23 PM
  #8486  
Jet J's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Space Force
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 519
Likes: 87
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Harsh reality is you could get a 10% paycut right now and you still wouldn’t give up your left seat or seniority to start over elsewhere.




Contract gains will reflect whatever the current market/economy conditions dictate. Thats how it’s always been. This isn’t 2022/2023 anymore.



Vote no to your hearts content. I do recall you were against the contract extension and pay increases on Sept 1 this year and next. How would that have gone? While all the other airlines would have gotten their pay raise for 2025 and 2026, you would have been left behind and complaining about it here.
After listening to your drivel over the last 5 years always in a tone slanted against the pilot group I’m convinced you’re management.
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 03:32 PM
  #8487  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 183
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Yes I did, and the JCBA is not touching every section of the contract. That is why it is important to make the distinction. Also, to my knowledge, the same sections were negotiated last time for the VX/AS JCBA.
That same update also showed that through negotiation a new section of the contract was created to handle schedule construction: section 24.

Why try to sell the pilot group on this being a limited negotiation? Is your shiny jet syndrome really that bad?
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 04:20 PM
  #8488  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 160
Likes: 129
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Yes I did, and the JCBA is not touching every section of the contract. That is why it is important to make the distinction. Also, to my knowledge, the same sections were negotiated last time for the VX/AS JCBA.
Can you point to what sections it isn't touching? Because, again, the union emails seem to indicate it is touching everything.
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 04:22 PM
  #8489  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 73
Likes: 10
From: PT-17, Rear
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Yes I did, and the JCBA is not touching every section of the contract. That is why it is important to make the distinction. Also, to my knowledge, the same sections were negotiated last time for the VX/AS JCBA.
What sections, by number, are not being negotiated? Should be easy to provide.
Reply
Old 08-07-2025 | 04:40 PM
  #8490  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 350
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams
Can you point to what sections it isn't touching? Because, again, the union emails seem to indicate it is touching everything.
You know what, you're right. That is my bad. I just went back and looked. I recant.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
04-23-2009 01:38 PM
vagabond
Major
31
04-15-2009 08:51 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices