DL Hiring: New Process
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 272
I’m not looking for sympathy, and would not blame Delta pilots. I’m simply stating a fact.
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
The flow up/flow down is tied to Delta having the ability to operate 35 additional 76 RJs. Should the courts decide the LOA is invalid, as it was specific to compass, Delta may have to park the additional 35 RJs- Because the flow is tied to additional scope, it could be revoked as well.
Anyway I don't see the 35 RJ's in question ending the flow. It *might* end the flow down provision, would would make it an all win no lose proposition to EDV pilots anyway.
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
That possibility (or not) within whatever agreement EDV has is one question. Another is would they eliminate the flow. Yet another is even if they do, if they still hire a similar amount of pilots from there, how would that hurt morale? Finally, even if DALPA loses and the company can deploy those 35 large RJ's, what certainty would there be that they go to EDV anyway and not SKYW/Republic/Mesa/etc?
#84
Does the EDV LOA/TA allow a company pull down in the event those 35 RJ's are permanently removed by the arbitrator? Even if they are, DL still needs pilots and an EDV with or without those 35 will still be a large spply of pilots. In fact, adding those 35 to EDV actually increases the churn and staffing issues a flow would exacerbate, right?
Anyway I don't see the 35 RJ's in question ending the flow. It *might* end the flow down provision, would would make it an all win no lose proposition to EDV pilots anyway.
Anyway I don't see the 35 RJ's in question ending the flow. It *might* end the flow down provision, would would make it an all win no lose proposition to EDV pilots anyway.
That possibility (or not) within whatever agreement EDV has is one question. Another is would they eliminate the flow. Yet another is even if they do, if they still hire a similar amount of pilots from there, how would that hurt morale? Finally, even if DALPA loses and the company can deploy those 35 large RJ's, what certainty would there be that they go to EDV anyway and not SKYW/Republic/Mesa/etc?
The irony of the whole thing is that the 35 RJ's probably wouldn't even go to Endeavor, certainly not all of them. But their MEC was given a take it or leave it offer. They really had no choice in the matter. And it probably will hurt 9E morale, especially for those lifers who had a brief glimmer of hope. Which again shows how cold a maneuver it is (was).
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 272
Yes, the Endeavor Flow LOA includes a clause to nullify the entire LOA if DL loses in arbitration. And if (when) DL loses, that's exactly what will happen. I would bet a month's pay they pull it down immediately. The ONLY reason they offered a flow was as a means to an end: 35 more RJ's. It's just that simple - and Machiavellian. DL management even agreed not to use one of the 35 until after the arbitrator rules, and you can bet they won't flow a single body unless and until they prevail.
The irony of the whole thing is that the 35 RJ's probably wouldn't even go to Endeavor, certainly not all of them. But their MEC was given a take it or leave it offer. They really had no choice in the matter. And it probably will hurt 9E morale, especially for those lifers who had a brief glimmer of hope. Which again shows how cold a maneuver it is (was).
The irony of the whole thing is that the 35 RJ's probably wouldn't even go to Endeavor, certainly not all of them. But their MEC was given a take it or leave it offer. They really had no choice in the matter. And it probably will hurt 9E morale, especially for those lifers who had a brief glimmer of hope. Which again shows how cold a maneuver it is (was).
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 272
That possibility (or not) within whatever agreement EDV has is one question. Another is would they eliminate the flow. Yet another is even if they do, if they still hire a similar amount of pilots from there, how would that hurt morale? Finally, even if DALPA loses and the company can deploy those 35 large RJ's, what certainty would there be that they go to EDV anyway and not SKYW/Republic/Mesa/etc?
RJs AND a flow, Endeavor must be given better flow terms.
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,066
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,251
Yes, the Endeavor Flow LOA includes a clause to nullify the entire LOA if DL loses in arbitration. And if (when) DL loses, that's exactly what will happen. I would bet a month's pay they pull it down immediately. The ONLY reason they offered a flow was as a means to an end: 35 more RJ's. It's just that simple - and Machiavellian. DL management even agreed not to use one of the 35 until after the arbitrator rules, and you can bet they won't flow a single body unless and until they prevail.
The irony of the whole thing is that the 35 RJ's probably wouldn't even go to Endeavor, certainly not all of them. But their MEC was given a take it or leave it offer. They really had no choice in the matter. And it probably will hurt 9E morale, especially for those lifers who had a brief glimmer of hope. Which again shows how cold a maneuver it is (was).
The irony of the whole thing is that the 35 RJ's probably wouldn't even go to Endeavor, certainly not all of them. But their MEC was given a take it or leave it offer. They really had no choice in the matter. And it probably will hurt 9E morale, especially for those lifers who had a brief glimmer of hope. Which again shows how cold a maneuver it is (was).
A thread about the 35 RJ's and flow was already established on APC: 35 Large RJs coming back?
#90
Back on topic, New OTS interviews start on 22 July. I'd be interested in hearing a trip report on the 'assessment' from the new hires. That seems to be the one 'new' thing from this new process?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post