Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
DL Hiring: New Process >

DL Hiring: New Process

Search
Notices

DL Hiring: New Process

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2021, 10:17 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
I honestly don’t mean to sound harsh or mean with this, truly: Not my problem. And this is not the right sub forum if you are looking for sympathy.

And if this happens to you, place your ire where it belongs, and that is not at the Delta pilots.
I’m not looking for sympathy, and would not blame Delta pilots. I’m simply stating a fact.
JacksonThunder is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 11:17 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by JacksonThunder View Post
The flow up/flow down is tied to Delta having the ability to operate 35 additional 76 RJs. Should the courts decide the LOA is invalid, as it was specific to compass, Delta may have to park the additional 35 RJs- Because the flow is tied to additional scope, it could be revoked as well.
Does the EDV LOA/TA allow a company pull down in the event those 35 RJ's are permanently removed by the arbitrator? Even if they are, DL still needs pilots and an EDV with or without those 35 will still be a large spply of pilots. In fact, adding those 35 to EDV actually increases the churn and staffing issues a flow would exacerbate, right?

Anyway I don't see the 35 RJ's in question ending the flow. It *might* end the flow down provision, would would make it an all win no lose proposition to EDV pilots anyway.
gloopy is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 11:19 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru View Post
I believe there is a provision in the agreement that if the company loses arbitration on the 35 RJs then the agreement becomes invalid.
That possibility (or not) within whatever agreement EDV has is one question. Another is would they eliminate the flow. Yet another is even if they do, if they still hire a similar amount of pilots from there, how would that hurt morale? Finally, even if DALPA loses and the company can deploy those 35 large RJ's, what certainty would there be that they go to EDV anyway and not SKYW/Republic/Mesa/etc?
gloopy is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 12:06 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Does the EDV LOA/TA allow a company pull down in the event those 35 RJ's are permanently removed by the arbitrator? Even if they are, DL still needs pilots and an EDV with or without those 35 will still be a large spply of pilots. In fact, adding those 35 to EDV actually increases the churn and staffing issues a flow would exacerbate, right?

Anyway I don't see the 35 RJ's in question ending the flow. It *might* end the flow down provision, would would make it an all win no lose proposition to EDV pilots anyway.
Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
That possibility (or not) within whatever agreement EDV has is one question. Another is would they eliminate the flow. Yet another is even if they do, if they still hire a similar amount of pilots from there, how would that hurt morale? Finally, even if DALPA loses and the company can deploy those 35 large RJ's, what certainty would there be that they go to EDV anyway and not SKYW/Republic/Mesa/etc?
Yes, the Endeavor Flow LOA includes a clause to nullify the entire LOA if DL loses in arbitration. And if (when) DL loses, that's exactly what will happen. I would bet a month's pay they pull it down immediately. The ONLY reason they offered a flow was as a means to an end: 35 more RJ's. It's just that simple - and Machiavellian. DL management even agreed not to use one of the 35 until after the arbitrator rules, and you can bet they won't flow a single body unless and until they prevail.

The irony of the whole thing is that the 35 RJ's probably wouldn't even go to Endeavor, certainly not all of them. But their MEC was given a take it or leave it offer. They really had no choice in the matter. And it probably will hurt 9E morale, especially for those lifers who had a brief glimmer of hope. Which again shows how cold a maneuver it is (was).
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 12:16 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
Yes, the Endeavor Flow LOA includes a clause to nullify the entire LOA if DL loses in arbitration. And if (when) DL loses, that's exactly what will happen. I would bet a month's pay they pull it down immediately. The ONLY reason they offered a flow was as a means to an end: 35 more RJ's. It's just that simple - and Machiavellian. DL management even agreed not to use one of the 35 until after the arbitrator rules, and you can bet they won't flow a single body unless and until they prevail.

The irony of the whole thing is that the 35 RJ's probably wouldn't even go to Endeavor, certainly not all of them. But their MEC was given a take it or leave it offer. They really had no choice in the matter. And it probably will hurt 9E morale, especially for those lifers who had a brief glimmer of hope. Which again shows how cold a maneuver it is (was).
Actually, the first 250 pilots were given flow notices. Those notices cannot be revoked, even if the flow is nullified. The first 20 pilots are expected to begin class in August.
JacksonThunder is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 12:17 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
That possibility (or not) within whatever agreement EDV has is one question. Another is would they eliminate the flow. Yet another is even if they do, if they still hire a similar amount of pilots from there, how would that hurt morale? Finally, even if DALPA loses and the company can deploy those 35 large RJ's, what certainty would there be that they go to EDV anyway and not SKYW/Republic/Mesa/etc?
The 35 RJs can go to any DCI carrier. We have a LOA that states Endeavor must have the best career progression to Delta. Even if Skywest or any regional received those
RJs AND a flow, Endeavor must be given better flow terms.
JacksonThunder is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 12:19 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,066
Default

Originally Posted by JacksonThunder View Post
Actually, the first 250 pilots were given flow notices. Those notices cannot be revoked, even if the flow is nullified. The first 20 pilots are expected to begin class in August.
I thought they gave the first 20 a deferral.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 12:23 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,251
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15 View Post
Yes, the Endeavor Flow LOA includes a clause to nullify the entire LOA if DL loses in arbitration. And if (when) DL loses, that's exactly what will happen. I would bet a month's pay they pull it down immediately. The ONLY reason they offered a flow was as a means to an end: 35 more RJ's. It's just that simple - and Machiavellian. DL management even agreed not to use one of the 35 until after the arbitrator rules, and you can bet they won't flow a single body unless and until they prevail.

The irony of the whole thing is that the 35 RJ's probably wouldn't even go to Endeavor, certainly not all of them. But their MEC was given a take it or leave it offer. They really had no choice in the matter. And it probably will hurt 9E morale, especially for those lifers who had a brief glimmer of hope. Which again shows how cold a maneuver it is (was).
Originally Posted by JacksonThunder View Post
Actually, the first 250 pilots were given flow notices. Those notices cannot be revoked, even if the flow is nullified. The first 20 pilots are expected to begin class in August.
Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I thought they gave the first 20 a deferral.
Scoop (Mod) just removed 3 pages of posts that had derailed this thread....please, in the name of everything holy and good, stay on target.

A thread about the 35 RJ's and flow was already established on APC: 35 Large RJs coming back?
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 12:28 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I thought they gave the first 20 a deferral.
(Last thing I’ll mention regarding the manner)

I haven’t kept up with it, but they probably did due to our staffing levels.
JacksonThunder is offline  
Old 07-09-2021, 01:31 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by JacksonThunder View Post
Actually, the first 250 pilots were given flow notices. Those notices cannot be revoked, even if the flow is nullified. The first 20 pilots are expected to begin class in August.
If that's true, I stand corrected.

Back on topic, New OTS interviews start on 22 July. I'd be interested in hearing a trip report on the 'assessment' from the new hires. That seems to be the one 'new' thing from this new process?
FangsF15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeeWizDriver
NetJets
1409
06-29-2023 05:25 PM
EUhoppa
Career Questions
10
07-22-2013 11:13 AM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
PistolP
Regional
12
11-22-2006 08:20 PM
Pylot
Hangar Talk
8
09-04-2006 05:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices