Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
08-10-2017 | 01:26 PM
Short bus CA (CR2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
I was talking to one of the mechanics in LGA today as he was doing a line check of our aircraft and asked him about the 700s. He mentioned the 700s are for over water flight because they have the over water equipment. Take it for what it is but such a small fleet for a single type suggests more 700 for 200 swaps in the future?
08-10-2017 | 01:54 PM
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 1
From: the right side
I was talking to one of the mechanics in LGA today as he was doing a line check of our aircraft and asked him about the 700s. He mentioned the 700s are for over water flight because they have the over water equipment. Take it for what it is but such a small fleet for a single type suggests more 700 for 200 swaps in the future?
08-10-2017 | 02:45 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
08-10-2017 | 02:47 PM
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 107
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
08-10-2017 | 02:49 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Oh, I see. I think the guy I quoted was referencing 900 flying you will get from Expressjet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
08-10-2017 | 02:53 PM
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 107
08-10-2017 | 03:03 PM
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
I was thinking the same thing. From a pilot standpoint having 700s may be easy, but I'm thinking bigger picture. There has to be logistics behind having a separate though similar aircraft from maintenance, to publications, FAA stuff-you name it. Three 700s is very curious to me.
08-10-2017 | 04:55 PM
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
He was just referring to the type of aircraft. Not carrier. Don't know why I'm writing on their behalf either. Bored and on a sit. That 900 Caribbean flying was EV then 9E then EV again along with a bit of CA as well. The GO loves to change routes to see who of the slaves performs better. Now it's going to us again unless we mess up like we have the RNAVs. Then I guess OO or the BRJ will do it.
08-10-2017 | 04:57 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
He was just referring to the type of aircraft. Not carrier. Don't know why I'm writing on their behalf either. Bored and on a sit. That 900 Caribbean flying was EV then 9E then EV again along with a bit of CA as well. The mother ship loves to change routes to see who of the slaves performs better. Now it's going to us again unless we mess up like we have the RNAVs. Then I guess OO or the BRJ will do it.
Speaking of the RNAV issue, what's the full story? I've heard the headings being given in ATL.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
08-10-2017 | 05:03 PM
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
Cleared direct RONNI, turned north
Cleared to MPASS, turned to a 360 degree heading after departure
Didn’t fly RNAV departure correctly
Cleared direct MPASS, departed straight out.
Pilot cleared for 27L approach, lined up to 27R
Given direct SLAWW, aircraft departed direct WALET
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
