PSA info
12-14-2015 | 08:53 PM
#131
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
New hire bonus
Looks like a $5,000 bonus is being offered to new hires now.
PSA Airlines | Regional Airline & US Airways Subsidiary
PSA Airlines | Regional Airline & US Airways Subsidiary
12-14-2015 | 10:26 PM
#132
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Looks like a $5,000 bonus is being offered to new hires now.
PSA Airlines | Regional Airline & US Airways Subsidiary
PSA Airlines | Regional Airline & US Airways Subsidiary
12-15-2015 | 06:31 AM
#135
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
I hope they don't get any new-hires. The pathetic first year pay needs to be raised significantly. Sign-on bonuses only improve the life of a new-hire for a few months, while the rest of the pilot group gets zip. The flow doesn't cut it.
Another weird tidbit at Psa, the airline doesn't offer vision insurance to the pilot group. Guess we don't need to read the station bulletins in the 200 at night anyway.
Another weird tidbit at Psa, the airline doesn't offer vision insurance to the pilot group. Guess we don't need to read the station bulletins in the 200 at night anyway.
12-15-2015 | 06:35 AM
#136
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Not sure. The a few months ago whiskey was doing Clt Tys trips. Found that odd and pointless as it gets rid of originators for Tys crews
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
12-15-2015 | 09:54 AM
#137
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Looks like a $5,000 bonus is being offered to new hires now.
PSA Airlines | Regional Airline & US Airways Subsidiary
PSA Airlines | Regional Airline & US Airways Subsidiary
The company cannot simply decide, unilaterally, that they want to compensate SOME of their pilots outside of the collective bargaining agreement that THEY AGREED TO!
If the company wants to pay their new pilots more, they're going to have renegotiate the contract,........ which means they are going to have to pay ALL OF US MORE!
Do you think the company would stand by if the pilots adopted the posture that they will no longer come to work unless the top 50 senior pilots were no longer subject to the 12 year pay cap? Of course not. One party to a contract cannot simply decide that they are going to ignore or abrogate an existing contract, (unless the other party ALLOWS it to happen).
Allowing the company to unilaterally abrogate the contract is a step in the wrong direction.
12-15-2015 | 10:01 AM
#138
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
No! It's a step in the WRONG DIRECTION!
The company cannot simply decide, unilaterally, that they want to compensate SOME of their pilots outside of the collective bargaining agreement that THEY AGREED TO!
If the company wants to pay their new pilots more, they're going to have renegotiate the contract,........ which means they are going to have to pay ALL OF US MORE!
Do you think the company would stand by if the pilots adopted the posture that they will no longer come to work unless the top 50 senior pilots were no longer subject to the 12 year pay cap? Of course not. One party to a contract cannot simply decide that they are going to ignore or abrogate an existing contract, (unless the other party ALLOWS it to happen).
Allowing the company to unilaterally abrogate the contract is a step in the wrong direction.
The company cannot simply decide, unilaterally, that they want to compensate SOME of their pilots outside of the collective bargaining agreement that THEY AGREED TO!
If the company wants to pay their new pilots more, they're going to have renegotiate the contract,........ which means they are going to have to pay ALL OF US MORE!
Do you think the company would stand by if the pilots adopted the posture that they will no longer come to work unless the top 50 senior pilots were no longer subject to the 12 year pay cap? Of course not. One party to a contract cannot simply decide that they are going to ignore or abrogate an existing contract, (unless the other party ALLOWS it to happen).
Allowing the company to unilaterally abrogate the contract is a step in the wrong direction.
I think if they increased first year FO pay to $35 /hour, and incrementally increased it by $1 /hour to $39 at the 4 year cap, they would attract plenty of applicants. And they should either increase the flow or get rid of the stupid "active CA" metric. No bonuses needed. However you and I both know that AAG isn't going to just increase pay. That will be the absolute last thing they will do. PSA, EVY, and PDT will all be offering bonuses and our NCs likely won't fight it.
12-15-2015 | 10:21 AM
#139
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
PSA needs new pilots MORE than the pilots need new pilots. The proof is in the fact that they're even OFFERING a hiring bonus!
Don't let this opportunity get away from you by saying "well we need 'em too,.......so it's ok that the company is trashing the contract".
Don't let this opportunity get away from you by saying "well we need 'em too,.......so it's ok that the company is trashing the contract".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
