Search
Notices

Jet blue wants us now

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2022, 02:22 PM
  #1031  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot View Post
Does Spirit flying anything smaller than an Airbus 319? If not, then it won’t go relative seniority since the fleets aren’t relatively the same. A220 and E190 are lower status/category planes. So it looks like you have 4 groups for your S&C groupings.

A-319/320/321 CA
A-220 E-190 CA
A-319/320/321 FO
A-220 E-190 FO

This will be a big driver how they integrate the seniority lists per ALPA merger policy.

And before you talk about pay rates, we tried that when we merged with United and it didn’t work.
For the millionth time, the E190 won’t be around when any of this other stuff will matter.
nuball5 is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 03:00 PM
  #1032  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 612
Default

Being from NK, my only real issue if B6 wins this and the deal goes through would be their lack of west coast flying and bases. Unless they expand bases in the west I imagine many NK pilots would bail because a transcon commute is a fate worse than death.
AllOva736 is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 03:14 PM
  #1033  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by Macjet View Post
NK and F9 overlap on 40% of their routes as of Feb 7, 2022. Is 40% your 'so much route overlap'?

https://simpleflying.com/spirit-fron...work-analysis/
Yes, that is a LOT. For a model that supposedly has limitless opportunities, you guys overlap on nearly HALF your network. That's the real reason your bosses want to merge. They are finding there are definitely upper limits to what routes support ULCC daily service.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 03:16 PM
  #1034  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5 View Post
For the millionth time, the E190 won’t be around when any of this other stuff will matter.
And the A220 pays 96-97% A320 pay.

The arbitrator won't consider them separate categories.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 03:17 PM
  #1035  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by AllOva736 View Post
Being from NK, my only real issue if B6 wins this and the deal goes through would be their lack of west coast flying and bases. Unless they expand bases in the west I imagine many NK pilots would bail because a transcon commute is a fate worse than death.
I'm confused, doesn't NK have west coast bases? Why would you need to do a transcon commute after the merger?
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 03:21 PM
  #1036  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by FahQ2 View Post
NK always knew who they were, just because the model changed doesn’t mean it was a rudderless ship. Prior to the shift to ULCC, NK was a niche company. Whether that niche was charter flights, or operating as a mom and pop carrier from the Midwest to the sun belt.

The point is until Indigo and Baldanza changed the company to a ULCC in the mid 2000’s, massive growth was never the focus. It’s like comparing McDonalds before Ray Croc to what it became after he changed the direction, it was happy to be a single store family run operation.

It’s not just about comparing a good growth period to a bad one, it’s a totally different company.
And that totally different company is totally different again... Both because it's much bigger, which means it can't grow fast, the business model is much further down the saturation path, and it's about to be sold... The reality you thought you had is no longer available to you, and it was a mirage anyway, as it wasn't going to be as successful going forward as you were led to believe...

It's nearly spilled milk at this point.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 03:22 PM
  #1037  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian View Post
I will answer to this reply, because I think it is the most pertinent. Yeah. I was/am wrong. You and the others are right. I did only look at the last 15 or so years, and I got lucky with the progression at NK, and would like to keep that. And like plenty of others have said: it's not like we are going to have a say in the matter, but that didn't stop me from shooting my mouth off. I will not be the one resenting other pilots if/when any of these mergers go through because I realize that whomever I fly with was in the same boat without a rudder.

also, you forgot the closing quotation mark
All good man. I think the real problem is you and I are too much alike. But you would have remembered the quotation mark. 😁
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 03:35 PM
  #1038  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,510
Default

Holy Jesus, Bluedriver, lay off the Dunkin’! You’ve had enough caffeine and it’s an inferior brand….
Tranquility is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 04:27 PM
  #1039  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Default Jet blue wants us now

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot View Post
Does Spirit flying anything smaller than an Airbus 319? If not, then it won’t go relative seniority since the fleets aren’t relatively the same. A220 and E190 are lower status/category planes. So it looks like you have 4 groups for your S&C groupings.

A-319/320/321 CA
A-220 E-190 CA
A-319/320/321 FO
A-220 E-190 FO

This will be a big driver how they integrate the seniority lists per ALPA merger policy.

And before you talk about pay rates, we tried that when we merged with United and it didn’t work.

The 220 pays $10 more than a spirit 321. But I’m sure the arbitrator will say it’s “lower status”


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 06-07-2022, 04:37 PM
  #1040  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by FahQ2 View Post
NK always knew who they were, just because the model changed doesn’t mean it was a rudderless ship. Prior to the shift to ULCC, NK was a niche company. Whether that niche was charter flights, or operating as a mom and pop carrier from the Midwest to the sun belt.

The point is until Indigo and Baldanza changed the company to a ULCC in the mid 2000’s, massive growth was never the focus. It’s like comparing McDonalds before Ray Croc to what it became after he changed the direction, it was happy to be a single store family run operation.

It’s not just about comparing a good growth period to a bad one, it’s a totally different company.
At no point I said it was a rudderless ship. NK had 39 years to get it's stuff together and JB had 22 before this point in time. Doesn't matter what NK chose to do at the time, growth is growth. The fellow pilot pointed to growth in NK prime time without any limits in his claim, why can't a JB pilot do the same? Balance the equation.

You said "it's not just about good growth to a bad one". That's exactly my point and everyone else point who commented on it. He can't just point to a growth period and say NK was superior on growth hence blah blah blah. You can go back and read what he said.
Bgood is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FLPilot50
Part 135
24
12-10-2019 06:03 PM
APCJacob
JetBlue
44
02-08-2019 02:41 AM
Fins Up
Major
245
04-01-2014 03:39 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
12-30-2009 03:56 AM
Bengalsfan
JetBlue
47
07-04-2005 11:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices