Search

Notices

SK trip to Toulouse

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2024 | 07:13 AM
  #71  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 111
Likes: 21
From: A320 captain
Default

Originally Posted by Red Forman
You realize there is another engine available that isn't grounded?
Is the issue on the 737 max engine anti-ice also effect the 320 series with the CFM leap engines?
Reply
Old 02-05-2024 | 10:27 AM
  #72  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Total BS
Is the issue on the 737 max engine anti-ice also effect the 320 series with the CFM leap engines?
from what I understand Boeing made the nacelle and the nacelle is the issue but someone please correct me if that's wrong.
Reply
Old 02-05-2024 | 11:03 AM
  #73  
New Hire
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
It wouldn't be crazy to think Airbus is definitely motivated to keep their foot as far into the door at United as they can. While United's 321 deliveries seem small compared the 737 deliveries, the A321 deliveries alone are larger than most other airlines in the world.



You're assuming Spirit's slots are assignable by Spirit. They might not be.
well here are some of the earlier slots…
https://www.ch-aviation.com/news/136...edium=facebook
Reply
Old 02-05-2024 | 01:39 PM
  #74  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 587
Likes: 105
From: 73FO
Default

Originally Posted by Merequetengue
Hey now, give credit where credit is due! Boeing and their suppliers went from having hundreds of extra holes drilled incorrectly in the fuselage to only 2? This is a massive improvement!!!
Reply
Old 02-05-2024 | 04:40 PM
  #75  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Total BS
Is the issue on the 737 max engine anti-ice also effect the 320 series with the CFM leap engines?
Nada


filler
Reply
Old 02-05-2024 | 11:30 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
Yes





Unlike DALALPA and their PWA, there is also that section of the UPA which says UAL ALPA has to agree to it. As far as I'm aware, going all the way back to 2014-2015 time frame, we have not based on information from the Crew Rest Oversight Committee (CROC). I certainly hope we wouldn't be advocating waiving a section of our UPA...without something big in return for the pilots.
It’s literally a corner cut off the mattress by a few inches for aesthetics to conform to stairs leading up to the bunk, and it’s only one of them. Unless you’re 6’8”, and you rest your feet on the corners while you sleep, you’ll never even know. Technically the mattress width and height are well within guidance.

If you’re willing to snub an order of 100 wide bodies (SK words not mine) over something that stupid and trivial your priorities are screwed up. I’m not talking about a TI style fire sale of leverage the way he gave everything away for 6 years… but if you want something in return, it would be an all new fleet of modern wide bodies and the pay/QOL that comes with them.
Reply
Old 02-06-2024 | 03:40 AM
  #77  
dingdong's Avatar
Jorts and New Balance
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 230
Likes: 61
From: Ready for the overnight
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
If you’re willing to snub an order of 100 wide bodies (SK words not mine) over something that stupid and trivial your priorities are screwed up.
I would much rather have some new Airbus wide bodies with goofy mattresses than more stupid 737’s
Reply
Old 02-06-2024 | 04:00 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
Default

Originally Posted by kevin18
This may be the most ridiculous thing I’ve seen. You’re trying to tell me that a descent rate down to 10k from 40k is a limiting factor? What do those things last, 15 minutes? Not a memory item so I really don’t care. Regardless, you put that thing down at 320Kias in an idle descent and boards out it’ll be a, at most, 20 second difference between 41k and 39k.
That is the limiting factor on many aircraft. Generally you need to show you can get down to 10,000 feet in 12 minutes. It could also be a performance limit or a limit due to the pressurization system.
Reply
Old 02-06-2024 | 04:36 AM
  #79  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 406
Likes: 5
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
It’s literally a corner cut off the mattress by a few inches for aesthetics to conform to stairs leading up to the bunk, and it’s only one of them. Unless you’re 6’8”, and you rest your feet on the corners while you sleep, you’ll never even know. Technically the mattress width and height are well within guidance.

If you’re willing to snub an order of 100 wide bodies (SK words not mine) over something that stupid and trivial your priorities are screwed up. I’m not talking about a TI style fire sale of leverage the way he gave everything away for 6 years… but if you want something in return, it would be an all new fleet of modern wide bodies and the pay/QOL that comes with them.

The issue not a WB order it’s that in series of events we (the pilots of United) might find ourselves with an item in the contract that the company needs relief. Don’t just give the relief away! Maybe we increase the hourly rate a few percentage points. Maybe we get 3% pay raise after the amendable date until a new contract is signed. If Airbus makes the 350 a requirement to get competitive prices on close in 321 deliveries and we can get something for change in our contract then that is truely a win! I believe this is what most people are talking about. Take leverage when you happen upon it and secure something for long term.
Reply
Old 02-06-2024 | 05:48 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 82spukram
The issue not a WB order it’s that in series of events we (the pilots of United) might find ourselves with an item in the contract that the company needs relief. Don’t just give the relief away! Maybe we increase the hourly rate a few percentage points. Maybe we get 3% pay raise after the amendable date until a new contract is signed. If Airbus makes the 350 a requirement to get competitive prices on close in 321 deliveries and we can get something for change in our contract then that is truely a win! I believe this is what most people are talking about. Take leverage when you happen upon it and secure something for long term.
Maybe get a decent PBS system like NavBlue.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blowtheboots
Delta
37
11-22-2023 09:21 AM
gasnhaul
FedEx
16
02-26-2017 10:29 AM
Cheddar
United
98
05-30-2013 04:51 AM
Adlerdriver
Cargo
1
07-25-2008 06:29 PM
Old Herk GUy
Cargo
61
03-13-2008 02:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices