Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2013 | 06:42 PM
  #1931  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Default

BLAH, BLAH, FREAKIN BLAHHHHHHH.... In other news, F ASA/XJET/SureJet/AtlanticSoutheast/SKYW inc.... Just sent out app number 23/24 since 1/1/2012... can't wait to get out... If I'm here when this whole thing works out I hope we can all take a deep breath... Maybe drink a beer as we watch the regionals dissapear... Seriously guys, regionals as we know it wont be arount in 10 years. Don't get your panties in a bunch over what might happen or who has a better system, or 5 percent vs 7... No point, regionals will die anyways. The bigger rj rfp's are for trades for smaller rj's and shrinkage.

Everyone needs to think bigger picture. One list. ASA/XJT/SKYW. It's the only way this whole game works out in the end. It's the only way to force JA's hand.

In other news stop infighting.... Also, drink sweetwater... great stuff!!!
Old 01-03-2013 | 06:44 PM
  #1932  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Yup, a sign of a TA with compromise on both sides is like the fiscal cliff deal, everybody on both sides is ****ed off.

L-ASA guys, I think our chances of keeping Flight Line PBS has vanished. All signs point to the company supporting Smartpref. If L-XJT is able to back out of their No PBS stance, we can meet them in the middle by letting Flight Line go.
Finally someone gets it! You know you have a successful negotiation when both sides are a little unhappy. LXJT pilots will not be very happy about losing line bidding, LASA pilots will not be happy about losing flightline....bingo, thats a negotiation! Instead of both sides being mad about what they lost, lets ban together and get the best work rules we possibly can for whatever neutral system we can agree on!
Old 01-03-2013 | 07:22 PM
  #1933  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo
Translation: The XJT MEC and McPickle have lied to you. Remember SM said that they would not give up line bidding.
Wrong. Neither SM or the XJT MEC have ever said that they wouldn't give up line bidding. They said they would keep an open mind on the issue IF the right PBS system was found and IF the right work rules were in place.
Old 01-03-2013 | 09:34 PM
  #1934  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
What I'm saying is that without a joint contract, section 26 of ours still stands. And the company triggered it. These negotiations for these aircraft pay rates will be outside of section 6, the way it was intended when that section was written 8 years ago. Unless the XJT MEC is kind enough to let you guys in the grown ups table, I don't see it happening.
Now that's funny. The "lack" of experience that your team has in negotiation speaks for itself. How many contracts have you negotiated? Oh, that's right 1. Your first one when you came into ALPA that was about 2003. Then there was the "givebacks", no Section 6, in 2007 approx. When you guys where with the CAL independents they did most of the work for you. Where you even flying in 1996?
This is the classic irrelevant conclusion fallacy. You said that the ASA MEC will be required to be in these negotiations. I said that I don't believe so. Then you mention something from left field? Ok, whatever you say.


I guess the XJT pilots were right about the ASA pilots....It is us that need to get on board....They have gone from not wanting PBS at all to supporting a cheaper cost PBS that is supported by management and now they are giddy over the fact that the 70-90 seat payrate is going to be settled by an arbitrator shortly after the new Pinnacle rates hit the street.....

Bravo XJT MEC...You really showed us how to hold the line.

The good news with all of this is we will now be more cost competitive....Provided all of this passes the pilots now that almost everyone is going to hate the TA now....
You are getting the MEC mixed up with the pilots who post on these forums. All along your guys have never been interested in compromise. They have been negotiating in bad faith. Management is now punishing you guys AGAIN! Remember? You kept telling us how you've seen this before and soon enough we outdo find out that we shouldn't mess with Jerry? All along its been your guys making the same mistakes they made in the last contract negotiations. This is ALL your guys' doing. You made your bed so now sleep in it.

Last edited by johnso29; 01-10-2013 at 05:40 AM. Reason: Removed quote of flamebait
Old 01-04-2013 | 05:03 AM
  #1935  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,133
Likes: 192
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
This is the classic irrelevant conclusion fallacy. You said that the ASA MEC will be required to be in these negotiations. I said that I don't believe so. Then you mention something from left field? Ok, whatever you say.

You are getting the MEC mixed up with the pilots who post on these forums. All along your guys have never been interested in compromise. They have been negotiating in bad faith. Management is now punishing you guys AGAIN! Remember? You kept telling us how you've seen this before and soon enough we outdo find out that we shouldn't mess with Jerry? All along its been your guys making the same mistakes they made in the last contract negotiations. This is ALL your guys' doing. You made your bed so now sleep in it.
Correct, last time we made a militant stance 17 900s to we're supposed to go to ASA headed to SKYW. Some say the 900s were going to go anyway but I don't buy that. I'd let management fool me at least once before becoming militant.

The more I hear L-XJT's story the more they make sense to me. The entire L-ASA employee group is probably being misled by this nasty rumor that Jerry is going to drop the hammer on XJT. Even I fell for it. We need to drop this arrogant "we bought them" "get on board" attitude real quick or it might backfire badly.

I know at least one of our newly elected reps is about compromise. It's time for us L-ASA line pilots to start making some calls to the LEC.

Last edited by johnso29; 01-10-2013 at 05:41 AM.
Old 01-09-2013 | 06:43 AM
  #1936  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Correct, last time we made a militant stance 17 900s to we're supposed to go to ASA headed to SKYW. Some say the 900s were going to go anyway but I don't buy that. I'd let management fool me at least once before becoming militant.

The more I hear L-XJT's story the more they make sense to me. The entire L-ASA employee group is probably being misled by this nasty rumor that Jerry is going to drop the hammer on XJT. Even I fell for it. We need to drop this arrogant "we bought them" "get on board" attitude real quick or it might backfire badly.

I know at least one of our newly elected reps is about compromise. It's time for us L-ASA line pilots to start making some calls to the LEC.
Well it seems you are in the minority at ASA but I'm glad you are finally seeing things without the ASA Kool aid goggles. Maybe you should make some (re)calls to the people that are purposely misleading you and your fellow pilots.
Old 01-09-2013 | 07:52 AM
  #1937  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cybourg10
Well it seems you are in the minority at ASA but I'm glad you are finally seeing things without the ASA Kool aid goggles. Maybe you should make some (re)calls to the people that are purposely misleading you and your fellow pilots.
That sort of statement isn't constructive at all. Recall the current system we use while it will be tweaked some, works and is used by airlines. It is fully implemented and has the overall support of the pilot group. The system being proposed has no customers, no background information and will some awarding issues with the CDO flying (which with the new rules will be more of). I'm not going to question your Sched Chair's commitment. I believe his heart is in the right place but it could be years to get this software right. We know Flightline could be in a JCBA tomorrow.

It isn't about the koolaid, it is about what is a known quantity. Flightline known, SmartPref isn't regardless of how much SM, MK and BM say otherwise.
Old 01-09-2013 | 09:04 AM
  #1938  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Default

Originally Posted by Redundant Guy
That sort of statement isn't constructive at all. Recall the current system we use while it will be tweaked some, works and is used by airlines. It is fully implemented and has the overall support of the pilot group. The system being proposed has no customers, no background information and will some awarding issues with the CDO flying (which with the new rules will be more of). I'm not going to question your Sched Chair's commitment. I believe his heart is in the right place but it could be years to get this software right. We know Flightline could be in a JCBA tomorrow.

It isn't about the koolaid, it is about what is a known quantity. Flightline known, SmartPref isn't regardless of how much SM, MK and BM say otherwise.
Flightline with an entirely new scheduling section, no vacation low, and all new contract is not a known quantity. Everything will be different and skedplus really looks like a good program. The main thing that ****ed me off about flightline is its need for people on full time trip loss to manipulate the award. Those same people are the ones spreading the misinformation about skedplus and are being left to "evaluate" the program. Huge conflict of interest!
Old 01-09-2013 | 03:05 PM
  #1939  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows
Flightline with an entirely new scheduling section, no vacation low, and all new contract is not a known quantity. Everything will be different and skedplus really looks like a good program. The main thing that ****ed me off about flightline is its need for people on full time trip loss to manipulate the award. Those same people are the ones spreading the misinformation about skedplus and are being left to "evaluate" the program. Huge conflict of interest!
The PWG guys are not on full time trip loss. This is blatant lie being spread by your side only to inflame the issue. The guy who did the white paper doesn't even run the Flightline system. Thus the guy wasn't interested in preserving his PWG gig. If Flightline were the system used for the combined pilot group, it would be administered by a COMBINED scheduling committee. Why would anyone want a CRJ guys running ERJ runs and vice versa. Another lie being spread to **** people off. Pointless.

I find incredible that you guys will toss whatever bombs you can to get the emotions spun up. You attack many things on our side that your guys know nothing about but yet they will happily say to paint our guys in a negative light.

Most guys that volunteer for the union work work way more days than they get paid for. To attack them just to make yourself feel better about the process might make a big man on the ERJ side but it looks foolish to everybody else. Regardless of what is said here, hopefully we'll all be under under umbrella and those same guys will be fighting for you.
Old 01-09-2013 | 04:12 PM
  #1940  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

I couldn't care less which system we actually use, but I am very concerned about having a system that ignores seniority through globalization or any other method. I also think it is foolish to support a system that has never actually been used to run our bids. It would also appear to be a waste of money to try and reinvent the wheel by attempting to use a Pref Bid system that has never been used before. I'm not sold on Flightline, but I am currently much less sold on SmartPref, primarily because I can't actually see it in action. If we are going to end up in a battle over Flightline or SmartPref, then the 2 systems are going to have to be programmed to handle our new work rules, we are going to have to learn both systems, we are going to have to bid with both each month, then decide on the system based on the results, not based on somebody's word. Nothing works the way the salesman says it does, so the only meaningful comparison is to bid with both for a few months.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices