Search

Notices

Reserve for Dummies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2025 | 05:26 PM
  #4431  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,547
Likes: 1,155
Default

Originally Posted by LumberJack
I wouldn't call it a 2 hour grey area. It's pilot and day specific. If you can get there in 1 hour, cool. 3 hours? Great. Just let them know what time you'll be there if you can't make report.

If scheduling calls and "asks" if you can do it in 30 minutes, they're violating the PWA and need to be reported to ALPA.
They can call and ask if you can be there in 30 minutes and you can say no. They still MUST give you the trip. If they skip you AT THEIR CONVENIENCE, you are due a penalty for assignment out of order
Reply
Old 12-10-2025 | 05:33 PM
  #4432  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 385
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
They can call and ask if you can be there in 30 minutes and you can say no. They still MUST give you the trip. If they skip you AT THEIR CONVENIENCE, you are due a penalty for assignment out of order
I made a post here:

MOU 25-05

About where 23M7 might be due to a RES pilot. This would be an example of that.
Reply
Old 12-10-2025 | 05:42 PM
  #4433  
LumberJack's Avatar
Coverage Award...
Community Favorite
Loved
5 Years
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 129
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
They can call and ask if you can be there in 30 minutes and you can say no. They still MUST give you the trip. If they skip you AT THEIR CONVENIENCE, you are due a penalty for assignment out of order
Thank you for clarifying, absolutely.
Reply
Old 12-10-2025 | 06:45 PM
  #4434  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 393
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
I made a post here:

MOU 25-05

About where 23M7 might be due to a RES pilot. This would be an example of that.
Too bad it is just credit toward guarantee if you’re not full.
Reply
Old 12-11-2025 | 06:15 AM
  #4435  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 844
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Ok, PWA aficionados... is a SC that starts before midnight and ends after midnight same day or next day?

23.Q.6.c. exception

Last edited by notEnuf; 12-11-2025 at 06:52 AM.
Reply
Old 12-11-2025 | 06:26 AM
  #4436  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,174
Likes: 584
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Ok, PWA efficienados... is a SC that starts before midnight and ends after same day or next day?

23.Q.6.c. exception
If you're talking about for bidding them, it is based on the report time. So a 2359 SC on the 12th would be awarded on today's automated SC assignment run as a next day SC award, just like a 1000, 1200, 1800, etc SC tomorrow would aslo be.

So for a GS award, if you have 2359 SC tomorrow, you can get a GS today, but not on the day that the SC starts (even if it's only 1 minute of that day). Put another way, a 2359 SC counts on the day it starts, not the day it bleeds into.
Reply
Old 12-11-2025 | 06:37 AM
  #4437  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 844
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
If you're talking about for bidding them, it is based on the report time. So a 2359 SC on the 12th would be awarded on today's automated SC assignment run as a next day SC award, just like a 1000, 1200, 1800, etc SC tomorrow would aslo be.

So for a GS award, if you have 2359 SC tomorrow, you can get a GS today, but not on the day that the SC starts (even if it's only 1 minute of that day). Put another way, a 2359 SC counts on the day it starts, not the day it bleeds into.
This refers to a 2100-0300 SC and a GS for the next day being denied and removed because of the SC starting today. There was no rest issue. 23.Q.6.c. exception was sighted as the reason.
Reply
Old 12-11-2025 | 06:49 AM
  #4438  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,174
Likes: 584
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
This refers to a 2100-0300 SC and a GS for the next day being denied and removed because of the SC starting today. There was no rest issue. 23.Q.6.c. exception was sighted as the reason.
There is no provision for getting a futher out GS with a closer in SC/rotation assignment. There are only 2 things guaranteed:

1. You can get a same day GS even if you have a next day or second day assignment already on your schedule
2. You can get a next day GS even if you already have a second day assignment already on your schedule.

You cannot get a GS that conflicts with an assignment on the same day. SRH page 49 spells out what I just typed out.
Reply
Old 12-11-2025 | 07:01 AM
  #4439  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 844
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
There is no provision for getting a futher out GS with a closer in SC/rotation assignment. There are only 2 things guaranteed:

1. You can get a same day GS even if you have a next day or second day assignment already on your schedule
2. You can get a next day GS even if you already have a second day assignment already on your schedule.

You cannot get a GS that conflicts with an assignment on the same day. SRH page 49 spells out what I just typed out.
If I understand this correctly... (my GS award was well before my 2100-0300 SC and did not conflict with it and the trip started 5 hours after the SC would have ended next day) They are claiming the SC was not removed at their discretion therefore I would not have rest prior to the next day GS. The thing I wonder about is their discretion to not remove the SC. This exact scenario has always resulted in the SC being removed and my GS awarded. It says next day can't prevent the GS, they are saying they have discretion to not remove the same day starting SCs even if there's adequate rest prior and no other issues. This is the first time I've had a GS removed for 23.Q.6.c. exception so I want to understand it. Thanks for the ref.

Last edited by notEnuf; 12-11-2025 at 07:14 AM.
Reply
Old 12-11-2025 | 07:32 AM
  #4440  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 385
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
If I understand this correctly... (my GS award was well before my 2100-0300 SC and did not conflict with it and the trip started 5 hours after the SC would have ended next day) They are claiming the SC was not removed at their discretion therefore I would not have rest prior to the next day GS. The thing I wonder about is their discretion to not remove the SC. This exact scenario has always resulted in the SC being removed and my GS awarded. It says next day can't prevent the GS, they are saying they have discretion to not remove the same day starting SCs even if there's adequate rest prior and no other issues. This is the first time I've had a GS removed for 23.Q.6.c. exception so I want to understand it. Thanks for the ref.
A way to think of it might be like this:

The SC is "owned" by the day on which it begins (in this case, same-day.) The GS for next day would have required the removal of some part of the SC to allow for rest. But since that SC is "owned" by same-day, they aren't required to drop or modify it to accommodate for the next-day GS.

The Exception you cited would apply to a SC that begins (is "owned" by) next-day, but that's not the case here.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BestForward
JetBlue
14679
Yesterday 12:58 AM
Heavyflyer
FedEx
21
04-11-2021 09:13 AM
GoJet Recruiter
GoJet
165
05-21-2018 10:51 AM
Flytolive
United
714
01-12-2016 03:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices