Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2013 | 02:10 PM
  #3231  
Vertisch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Catching breathe
Default

Originally Posted by mking84
ZERO incentives like that unless I get a check for the difference. They want to offer a hiring bonus? Fine, but cut a check to every pilot on the seniority list too. Sorry but that's how it goes, I stuck out first year just like every other guy.
This is exactly why first year pay will never go up. Someones always "gotta get theirs".
Old 06-13-2013 | 05:14 PM
  #3232  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Kilroy
Any news on the contract? I have been hearing that the union is going to cave on dual qual. This after " it was not safe" stance. Also with the new rest rules we are going to have to work an extra 2 days per month to maintain productivity with 5 day trips. Top that off with people quitting or not showing up for class after being hired. There is only a few people in the applicant pool. The reserve list is always depleted. A lot of people are now looking elsewhere to get out of here. But yet CT thinks its all good. G.O won't be saying that anymore in the next few years....
I was told by a union insider that dual qual is a done deal, the only question is the pay. And from what I was told about what's being talked about at the table, pilots currently on the 700/900 are going to get hosed. Company wants pay banding (seniority%) like in the XJT arbitration award. Union wants to "settle" for a SKW type override. Either one will force current 700 pilots to take a pay cut. Automatic TA fail, IMO.
Curious, why is the override better than seniority based pay rates?

They need 51% once it gets past the MECs and it really is a math problem to them. The people they can scare into voting yes with doom and gloom, the lifers who just want a job for a few more years, and the people who can't be bothered because they are on the way out are not going to help our chances.
Actually, they need 50%+1.
Old 06-13-2013 | 05:32 PM
  #3233  
crflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
I think you misunderstood. I said if you already have 18 months of 121 experience (as in former Comair guys) then you start at year 2 pay. That we we attract a higher caliber of candidates.
He didn't misunderstand, he's saying why would the company hire them at $35 an hour when they could take someone without that "18 months 121" and pay them ten dollars less.
Old 06-13-2013 | 05:47 PM
  #3234  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
How about dual qual with current 700 rates as the base rate and an override for 700/900 flying? Is that still a 'No' vote?
I was told this isn't an option. The company has the XJT arbitration in hand and is beating us over the head with it. We're looking at a blended rate. For three times as much work. Look up the arbitrated 76 seat pay on the XJT side. Add a buck or two.
Old 06-13-2013 | 06:02 PM
  #3235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
I was told this isn't an option. The company has the XJT arbitration in hand and is beating us over the head with it. We're looking at a blended rate. For three times as much work. Look up the arbitrated 76 seat pay on the XJT side. Add a buck or two.
I will probably vote no if this makes it to the TA, but it's not "three times as much work."
Old 06-13-2013 | 06:09 PM
  #3236  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

You guys better hurry up and get your deal inked before Eagle ALPA manages to screw the pooch with the extra concessions being asked by the new management putting us in line with Pinnacle.
Old 06-13-2013 | 06:12 PM
  #3237  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ASAnotASAP
I will probably vote no if this makes it to the TA, but it's not "three times as much work."
Really? Flying the 200 alone is three times as much work as the 700/900. And now you will have to memorize 3 sets of limitations for every checkride. Not to mention all the jacked up systems and procedures in the 200 we'll all have to re learn and be tested on.
Old 06-13-2013 | 07:02 PM
  #3238  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by mking84
ZERO incentives like that unless I get a check for the difference. They want to offer a hiring bonus? Fine, but cut a check to every pilot on the seniority list too. Sorry but that's how it goes, I stuck out first year just like every other guy.
So did they... the first time. This is an idea to make this place better, and in order for it to be a better place, people getting hired after us will not have to endure what we did. You know, the old 'leave it better than you found it' idea.

I endured first year pay, just like everyone else, and like everyone else, I shouldn't have had to. If I ever have to go somewhere else, it won't be a regional airline because I won't go back to that pay scale again. If I went back to engineering, I could again make six figures and be home every day. I would hate it, but I could do it. It is discraceful, bordering on criminal, that I would have to go back to 20k/yr 1st year pay if I got a job as a pilot at another regional airline. AND, it cost me LESS to become an engineer, professionally licensed in multiple states! You really think that's ok just because you had to do it?

My mama always said to treat people the way I wanted to be treated, not the way I was treated. I think I was in kindergarten or something when I learned that. It was a good lesson.
Old 06-13-2013 | 07:07 PM
  #3239  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
I was told this isn't an option. The company has the XJT arbitration in hand and is beating us over the head with it. We're looking at a blended rate. For three times as much work. Look up the arbitrated 76 seat pay on the XJT side. Add a buck or two.
I don't see it passing like that.
Old 06-14-2013 | 03:02 AM
  #3240  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Default

The only way to secure my vote is to receive my concession back and a pay rate adjusted for COL'ing. Anything less is flat out no! Go find someone to fly, oh my bad there is no one left willing to do this. Got you now!

Guys realize this perfect storm will never happen in our lifetime ever again, lets stick it to them or they can close the doors for all I care. Everyone is hiring and willing to pay what were worth e.g. UAL, Delta etc...my ATP comes with a price attached and its called, livable wage +
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices