Search

Notices

JCBA timeline extension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2014 | 06:26 AM
  #91  
Arado 234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Talking

Originally Posted by The Drizzle
"You're"

Filler
What about "You is"?
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 06:51 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Route66
Oh, BTW, the union has been busted since deregulation. Folks, the only influence anyone is affected by is the rank and file union who believe the APA has YOURE back. The union serves at the convenience of the company and the company knows it's. I don't represent management, I represent REALITY.

I'm not new to this forum, I just decided to jump in after all these years to give you pilots a reality check. Scope is done and if you disagree that's great. However, the guys at Envoy are chumps for taking one for the gipper (ALPA/APA). Do you think you'll get a reward job at Herndon or Dallas for standing up and saying no to the ones who have the leverage? You just may REREAD flying the line vol. I & II. Maybe you can't read.
Joined Nov 2014, with 8 posts... You are a regular old-timer, so senile that you think you have been here at the old folks home for years.
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 07:04 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Default

This is pure comedy gold. Too rich to pass up.

Originally Posted by Route66
Maybe you can't read.
Really? We (us pilots) can't read?

Originally Posted by Route66
Your a fool....

Your the stooge ....
Originally Posted by Route66
...the rank and file union who believe the APA has YOURE back.
Originally Posted by Route66
Here at the New American its everyone for themselves.

Originally Posted by Route66
If all of you want to educate yourselves...
If you're going to insult our ability to read and our education level, you may not want to come off as a grammar moron. Here's a thought...why don't you go improve your education and let us pilots suffer through our contract on our own. Buh-bye now...

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Not a surprising statement coming from someone who isn't a pilot.

***WARNING***

Folks, beware what has now started to occur - certain representatives of managements interests have begun to position themselves on this forum to influence AA pilots on a potential upcoming TA vote (should it come to that). Union busting and pilot manipulation tactics are part of the strategy.
EF,
I think you're wrong on this one. Management lackeys are educated. My guess is...this is a flight attendant. Probably bitter about their JCBA election results.
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 08:13 AM
  #94  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: A320 F/O
Default

Some numbers, pulled from memory from 1:00 AM last night...

The vast majority of L-US FA's voted, however 851 were ineligible most likely because they didn't even sign the AFPA paperwork.

3800 L-US voted YES
2800 L-US voted NO
57% YES

Can't remember the L-AA side numbers exactly, but roughly 1,000 voted NO more than voted YES.

Roughly 10,000 of the 14,000 L-AA side even bothered to vote (70%).

CLT and MIA were strong NOs

We had a NO voter with us, he voted NO just to show the company he wasn't completely happy with it, even though he thought it would pass and fully expected it to.
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 09:07 AM
  #95  
Hueypilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: B737
Default

Apparently that's what a number of FAs have been saying...that they voted "no" to "send the company a message". What message would that be? "Here, take your $82 million back, we don't want it".
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 09:35 AM
  #96  
The Drizzle's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234
What about "You is"?
It's ait yo
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 09:38 AM
  #97  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Default

83,000,000/24,000 =3,458.33

Keep the .33 if you like!
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 10:07 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by inline five
Some numbers, pulled from memory from 1:00 AM last night...

The vast majority of L-US FA's voted, however 851 were ineligible most likely because they didn't even sign the AFPA paperwork.

3800 L-US voted YES
2800 L-US voted NO
57% YES

Can't remember the L-AA side numbers exactly, but roughly 1,000 voted NO more than voted YES.

Roughly 10,000 of the 14,000 L-AA side even bothered to vote (70%).

CLT and MIA were strong NOs

We had a NO voter with us, he voted NO just to show the company he wasn't completely happy with it, even though he thought it would pass and fully expected it to.
I heard a higher total number were ineligible but your numbers seem more realistic - hope they are correct.
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 10:29 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Route66
Glass negotiates for the company. The unions "bust" their own unions. The East/West/TWA/APA seniority issue is ALL UNION. Here at the New American its everyone for themselves.
I will take my chances with ANY pilot group, seniority issues notwithstanding, over Glass and associates. Furthermore, exactly what was Glass brought on to accomplish?
Management would love to see us throw out the baby with the bath water. The rancor among the East/West was a major component to Parker's management style at US. Now Parker has to negotiate with a much more unified group. Folks like you can try to stir the pot but it isn't going to work. Most of us bargained with the Devil or God- if we ever got out of this seniority corner we would not make the same mistakes. Parker has to grow up too and understand that, at least for now, it's a different environment for commercial pilots. This union- whatever it is or is not- is our only hope.
Reply
Old 11-10-2014 | 12:56 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Well this isn't Parker/Kirby/Glass first rodeo. It's going to take professionals on par with them to win not a bunch of wishful thinking pilots who demand results yesterday. And have not the patience to see things though - generally, I might add
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
hoodabundy
United
219
08-18-2013 08:52 PM
Snarge
United
57
02-12-2013 06:33 AM
Thunder1
United
17
11-29-2011 03:16 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
115
11-22-2010 03:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices